Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft

Friendly amendment to Mark's suggestion

<h2>Incomplete Candidate Success Criteria</h2>

<p>The following are success criteria proposals by the task forces that
have been identified to address important accessibility barriers on the
web. However, they have not yet met one or more of the <a href="
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria>requirements for a
success criteria. </a> We are seeking feedback on the proposals to
determine whether or how they can meet the all the requirements, such as
being testable, implementable, apply to all content, and apply across all
technologies (or how to manage exceptions).  In addition, review from the
perspective of internationalization for proposals dealing with language and
symbology is requested.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Hakkinen, Mark T <mhakkinen@ets.org> wrote:

> I rewrote David’s proposal.  I wanted to also capture the issue of
> internationalization. The changes start of the link.
>
>
>
> <h2>Incomplete Candidate Success Criteria</h2>
>
> <p>The following are success criteria proposals by the task forces that
> have been identified to address important accessibility barriers on the
> web. However, they have not yet met one or more of the <a href="
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria>requirements for
> a success criteria. </a> We are seeking feedback on the proposals to
> determine whether or how they can meet the requirements of being testable,
> implementable, apply to all content, and apply across all technologies (or
> how to manage exceptions).  In addition, review from the perspective of
> internationalization for proposals dealing with language and symbology is
> requested.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/20/17, 4:07 PM, "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hmmm...
>
>
>
> I agree with Mark, but I also like the direction that David was
> suggesting. Perhaps the "explanation" paragraph needs some reworking:
>
> <draft>
>
> <p>The following are success criteria proposals by the task forces that
> have been identified to address important accessibility barriers on the
> web. However, they have not yet met one or more of the <a href="
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria>requirements for
> a success criteria</a>, *or are otherwise not mature enough for direct
> inclusion today. The Working Group solicits broader feedback on both the
> substance and editorial content of these draft Candidates*.</p>
>
> </draft>
>
>
>
> Something like that?
>
>
>
> JF
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Hakkinen, Mark T <mhakkinen@ets.org>
> wrote:
>
> Jason, I disagree with David’s proposal.  Suggesting that it is just
> wording changes that are needed when if fact there may be conceptual
> issues, lack of data, or other difficult problems.  It invites reviewers to
> edit, but not explore the deeper issues.
>
>
>
> On 2/20/17, 3:12 PM, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 3:02 PM
>
> >Incomplete Candidates" ?
>
>
>
> It could be something like this.
>
> *[Jason] […]*
>
> *I would be comfortable with language such as that which David has put
> forward here, preferably after moving the proposals into an Appendix, but
> leaving the two proposals that the working group agreed should go in the
> draft in the body of the document.*
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> John Foliot
>
> Principal Accessibility Strategist
>
> Deque Systems Inc.
>
> john.foliot@deque.com
>
>
>
> Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>