W3C home
>
Mailing lists
>
Public
>
public-html@w3.org
>
April 2007
public-html@w3.org from April 2007 by date
1773 messages
:
Starting
Sunday, 1 April 2007 00:04:27 GMT,
Ending
Monday, 30 April 2007 23:57:52 GMT
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [ date ] [
subject
]
Mail actions
: [
mail a new topic
]
Help
: [
How to use the archives
] [
Search in the archives
]
Monday, 30 April 2007
Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content)
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Support Existing Content
Philip & Le Khanh
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
David Hyatt
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
David Hyatt
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Tina Holmboe
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Tina Holmboe
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Dão Gottwald
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
David Hyatt
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
John Boyer
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
John Boyer
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Tina Holmboe
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
John Boyer
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
John Boyer
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Introduce <term> element
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
David Hyatt
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Maurice
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Tina Holmboe
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
M. Jackson Wilkinson
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Maurice
Re: Allow DIV inside any element
Maurice
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Maurice
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Maurice
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
Arthur Jennings
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Maurice
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Schalk Neethling
Re: Pandering to poor authorship
Maurice
Re: Introduce <term> element
Maurice
Re: Versioning and the end user
Maurice
Re: missing principle
Maurice
Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3)
Maurice
Re: Semantic vs. Presentational (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
Maurice
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Maurice
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Gareth Hay
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Elliott Sprehn
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
David Dailey
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
James Graham
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
James Graham
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Meta-question : why so few "Re: " subjects ?
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Murray Maloney
Re: Meta-question : why so few "Re: " subjects ?
Anne van Kesteren
Meta-question : why so few "Re: " subjects ?
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Gareth Hay
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Simon Pieters
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Murray Maloney
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Simon Pieters
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Dave Raggett
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
David Dailey
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Mark Birbeck
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Mark Birbeck
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
Jirka Kosek
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Cameron McCormack
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Dão Gottwald
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Andrew Stibbard
Monday, 30 April 2007
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Dave Raggett
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Simon Pieters
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Karl Dubost
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Karl Dubost
Re: survey of top web sites
Benjamin West
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Matthew Raymond
Re: survey of top web sites
Karl Dubost
Sunday, 29 April 2007
RE: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Dailey, David P.
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Karl Dubost
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Kornel Lesinski
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Mark Birbeck
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Schalk Neethling
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Matthew Ratzloff
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Bruce Lawson
Re: Allow DIV inside any element
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: task list
Schalk Neethling
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Elliott Sprehn
Re: task list
David Dailey
Re: Allow DIV inside any element
Mallory Mollo
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Daniel Glazman
[suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
Marat Tanalin
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Doug Schepers
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
Jirka Kosek
Re: Introduce <term> element
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Murray Maloney
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Murray Maloney
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Matthew Raymond
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
Anne van Kesteren
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
Jirka Kosek
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
Jirka Kosek
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Daniel Glazman
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Dannii
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Preston L. Bannister
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Doug Schepers
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Preston L. Bannister
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
John Boyer
Saturday, 28 April 2007
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Matthew Ratzloff
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
John Boyer
Another look at the Proposed Design Principles
Dailey, David P.
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Daniel Glazman
Re: Hand-coding HTML
Daniel Glazman
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
John Boyer
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Saturday, 28 April 2007
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Håkon Wium Lie
Re: missing principle
Preston L. Bannister
Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3)
Patrick Taylor
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
John Boyer
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Murray Maloney
Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3)
Dylan Smith
Re: Pandering to poor authorship
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Preston L. Bannister
Re: Versioning and the end user
Matthew Ratzloff
Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
Laurens Holst
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Preston L. Bannister
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Murray Maloney
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Murray Maloney
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: missing principle
Smylers
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Re: missing principle
Smylers
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Dave Raggett
Re: missing principle
Maciej Stachowiak
task list
Schalk Neethling
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Anne van Kesteren
Re: missing principle
Mike Schinkel
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
Mike Schinkel
Re: Introduce <term> element
Mike Schinkel
Re: missing principle
Anne van Kesteren
Re: Versioning and the end user
Mike Schinkel
Re: missing principle
Mike Schinkel
Re: missing principle
bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3)
Mike Schinkel
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
Mike Schinkel
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Roger Johansson
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
Mike Schinkel
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Roger Johansson
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Mike Schinkel
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
Mike Schinkel
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Mike Schinkel
Semantic vs. Presentational (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Mike Schinkel
Re: missing principle (small)
Dylan Smith
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Dylan Smith
Friday, 27 April 2007
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Matthew Raymond
RE: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Chris Wilson
Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content
Dailey, David P.
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Brad Fults
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Stephen Stewart
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
John Boyer
Re: Support Existing Content
Elliott Sprehn
Re: [public-html] <none>
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Mark Birbeck
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Support Existing Content
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content
Ian Hickson
HTML5 as our specification text for review? (formal question WBS survey)
Dan Connolly
Re: missing principle
Daniel Glazman
Re: missing principle
Dan Connolly
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Roger Johansson
Re: missing principle
bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Debi Orton
Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content
Dan Connolly
Re: [public-html] <none>
Gareth Hay
Re: [public-html] <none>
Gareth Hay
Re: [public-html] <none>
Smylers
Re: [public-html] <none>
Jeff Cutsinger
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: Support Existing Content
Gareth Hay
Re: [public-html] <none>
Smylers
Re: Support Existing Content
Henri Sivonen
Re: [public-html] <none>
Gareth Hay
Re: [public-html] <none>
Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: [public-html] <none>
Jeff Cutsinger
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Maurice
Re: [public-html] <none>
Maurice
[public-html] <none>
Gareth Hay
Re: Support Existing Content
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Support Existing Content
Smylers
Re: Support Existing Content
Gareth Hay
Re: Support Existing Content
Lachlan Hunt
Re: survey of top web sites
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Support Existing Content
Jonas Sicking
Re: missing principle
Smylers
Re: missing principle
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: missing principle
Daniel Glazman
Re: missing principle
Karl Dubost
Re: missing principle
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Dave Raggett
missing principle
Daniel Glazman
Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
Doug Schepers
Design Principles Update
Maciej Stachowiak
Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content
L. David Baron
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view
Henri Sivonen
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Henri Sivonen
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Maciej Stachowiak
Design principles: added three examples
Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Lachlan Hunt
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view
Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Preston L. Bannister
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Doug Schepers
RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view
Josh Sled
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Preston L. Bannister
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Dannii
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Doug Schepers
RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view
Dailey, David P.
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Ian Hickson
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Dannii
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Matthew Raymond
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Karl Dubost
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view
Matthew Raymond
Re: survey of top web sites
Sean Fraser
RE: survey of top web sites
Dailey, David P.
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Ian Hickson
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Mark Birbeck
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: survey of top web sites
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Mark Birbeck
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Thursday, 26 April 2007
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Mark Birbeck
Re: survey of top web sites
Sander Tekelenburg
RE: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review
Dailey, David P.
RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view
Dailey, David P.
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Maurice
Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review
Dan Connolly
HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review
T.V Raman
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Henri Sivonen
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Mark Birbeck
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
Maurice
Re: RE: survey of top web sites
Sean Fraser
Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review
Henri Sivonen
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Henri Sivonen
RE: survey of top web sites
Dan Connolly
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Henri Sivonen
Re: Feature Strings
Maurice
Re: new form control
Maurice
HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review
Dan Connolly
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Anne van Kesteren
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Ian Hickson
RE: survey of top web sites
Dailey, David P.
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Jeff Schiller
RE: Proposed Design Principles review
Dailey, David P.
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
Arthur Jennings
Re: INPUT-PIC form control
Thomas Broyer
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Daniel Spång
Re: survey of top web sites
Nick Fitzsimons
RE: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Dailey, David P.
About the Web Forms 2 proposal
Anne van Kesteren
Proposed Design Principles review
Ian Hickson
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Sander van Lambalgen
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
Maurice
HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
Preston L. Bannister
Re: survey of top web sites
Sean Fraser
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Sander Tekelenburg
scribe for today's teleconference?
Dan Connolly
Re: Let use this convention for conversation
Dan Connolly
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Jeff Schiller
Dublin workshop on web authoring
Dave Raggett
Re[2]: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Thomas Broyer
Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Dão Gottwald
Re: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Jonas Sicking
Re[4]: New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
INPUT-PIC form control
Dmitry Turin
Re: Let use this convention for conversation
Jonas Sicking
Let use this convention for conversation
Dmitry Turin
Re: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Jonas Sicking
Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
Fwd: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
Fwd: Re[4]: New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
Henri Sivonen
How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
Dmitry Turin
Wednesday, 25 April 2007
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
Maciej Stachowiak
Thursday, 26 April 2007
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Matthew Raymond
Wednesday, 25 April 2007
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
Scott Turner
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Scott Turner
Re: new form control
Kornel Lesinski
Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z (invited participants)
Dan Connolly
Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z
Dan Connolly
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: survey of top web sites
Sean Fraser
Re: survey of top web sites
Benjamin West
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
James Graham
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Marco Von Ballmoos
Re: HTML version issue summary?
L. David Baron
Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: survey of top web sites
David Dailey
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Sander Tekelenburg
agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z
Dan Connolly
Re: survey of top web sites
Anne van Kesteren
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
Jeff Schiller
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
David Dailey
Re: survey of top web sites
David Dailey
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Versioning of HTML fragments
Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Versioning of HTML fragments
Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
Sam Ruby
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
Thomas Broyer
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
James Graham
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
Eric Daspet
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Jeff Schiller
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
Henri Sivonen
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
Dannii
Separation of versioning concerns
Sam Ruby
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Matthew Raymond
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Matthew Raymond
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Dão Gottwald
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: HTML version issue summary?
L. David Baron
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
Josef Spillner
Re: HTML version issue summary?
David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Jeff Schiller
Re: survey of top web sites
Sean Fraser
Re: HTML version issue summary?
David Hyatt
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development
Simon Pieters
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Matthew Raymond
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Chasen Le Hara
Re: survey of top web sites
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Re: survey of top web sites
Sean Fraser
Re: HTML version issue summary?
David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary?
David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Chasen Le Hara
Re: survey of top web sites
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: survey of top web sites
Sean Fraser
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Jonas Sicking
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Dannii
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML version issue summary?
David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML version issue summary?
David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary?
David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML version issue summary?
David Hyatt
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Edward O'Connor
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Edward O'Connor
Tuesday, 24 April 2007
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
Matthew Raymond
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Preston L. Bannister
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Ian Hickson
HTML version issue summary?
Dan Connolly
Re: FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert
Dan Connolly
survey of top web sites
Dan Connolly
Re: Other roles we should fill (survey on tasks and roles)
Dan Connolly
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Dão Gottwald
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Dão Gottwald
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Sam Ruby
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
Edward O'Connor
Parsing of HTML fragments
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Versioning of HTML fragments
Marco Von Ballmoos
Re: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Thomas Broyer
Re: FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert
David Dailey
Re: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Preston L. Bannister
Re: New html-element: table3
Preston L. Bannister
Re: New html-element: table3
Jonas Sicking
Re: new form control
Matthew Ratzloff
Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags
Dão Gottwald
Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags
Dão Gottwald
Re[4]: new form control
Dmitry Turin
FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert
Dan Connolly
brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags
Dmitry Turin
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: new form control
Rene Saarsoo
Re[2]: New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
Re: New html-element: table3
Henri Sivonen
Re: BoF at XTech
Anne van Kesteren
Re: BoF at XTech
Olivier GENDRIN
New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
New html-element: table3
Dmitry Turin
Re: BoF at XTech
James Graham
Re: BoF at XTech
James Graham
Re: BoF at XTech
Anne van Kesteren
Monday, 23 April 2007
Versioning of HTML fragments
Sam Ruby
Tuesday, 24 April 2007
Re: BoF at XTech (was: Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech)
Karl Dubost
Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey)
Dan Connolly
Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey)
L. David Baron
Monday, 23 April 2007
Re: Re[2]: new form control
Kornel Lesinski
Re: Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column.But sometimes we need to visualize three tables(for example, database tables) as one table:first table contains names of rows,second table contains names of columns (this table determine quantity of columns),third table contains data.New html-element: table-dim
Jonas Sicking
non-rectangular images & <img> tag
Dailey, David P.
BoF at XTech (was: Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech)
Henri Sivonen
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Dan Connolly
Re: HTML5 proposal response
Ian Hickson
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
David Hyatt
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
David Hyatt
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Dan Connolly
Re: Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column. But sometimes we need to visualize three tables (for example, database tables) as one table: first table contains names of rows, second table contains names of columns (this table
Dão Gottwald
Re: Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column. But sometimes we need to visualize three tables (for example, database tables) as one table: first table contains names of rows, second table contains names of columns (this table
Preston L. Bannister
RE: HTML5 proposal response
Chris Wilson
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Jeff Schiller
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: Issue Tracking
Dão Gottwald
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Schalk Neethling
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Daniel Glazman
Re: HTML5 proposal response
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
James Graham
Re: HTML5 proposal response
Daniel Glazman
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
Daniel Glazman
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
David Dailey
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Daniel Glazman
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Daniel Glazman
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Benjamin Chait
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Daniel Glazman
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Daniel Glazman
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Daniel Glazman
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Daniel Glazman
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Daniel Glazman
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Daniel Glazman
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Daniel Glazman
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Daniel Glazman
Re: Feature Strings
Bill Mason
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
paul haine
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Maciej Stachowiak
Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column.
Dmitry Turin
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Benjamin Chait
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Doug Schepers
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Matthew Raymond
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal
Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Doug Schepers
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Feature Strings
Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Dylan Smith
Sunday, 22 April 2007
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Other roles we should fill
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Doug Schepers
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Elliott Sprehn
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Dailey, David P.
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Roger Johansson
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Preston L. Bannister
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Doug Schepers
Saturday, 21 April 2007
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Charles Ying
Sunday, 22 April 2007
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal
Preston L. Bannister
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Jeff Schiller
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Matthew Raymond
Saturday, 21 April 2007
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Dão Gottwald
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Kornel Lesinski
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Terje Bless
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development
Brad Fults
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
liorean
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Patrick Taylor
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Dão Gottwald
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Dão Gottwald
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Matthew Raymond
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Terje Bless
Re: Introduce <term> element
Laurens Holst
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Matthew Raymond
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Arthur Jennings
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Maciej Stachowiak
Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
Maciej Stachowiak
Friday, 20 April 2007
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
Chris Wilson
Re: new form control
Kornel Lesinski
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
David Dailey
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Terje Bless
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development
Bill Mason
Re: Editor and authors
James Graham
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Terje Bless
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Alexander Graf
Re: Editor and authors
Terje Bless
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Henri Sivonen
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Lachlan Hunt
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Patrick Taylor
Update on affiliation
Alexander Graf
Re: new form control
Dão Gottwald
Re: new form control
Dão Gottwald
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Matthew Raymond
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Matthew Raymond
new form control
Dmitry Turin
Re: Editor and authors
Dão Gottwald
Re: Editor and authors
Henri Sivonen
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Henri Sivonen
Re: Editor and authors
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Feature Strings
Smylers
Editor and authors Re: HTML5 proposal response
Karl Dubost
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Lachlan Hunt
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Lachlan Hunt
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Terje Bless
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Lachlan Hunt
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Terje Bless
Re: HTML5 proposal response
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Matthew Ratzloff
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Matthew Raymond
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Matthew Raymond
RE: HTML5 proposal response
Dailey, David P.
Thursday, 19 April 2007
Re: HTML5 proposal response
Ian Hickson
HTML5 proposal response
Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
Sander Tekelenburg
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Feature Strings
Jeff Schiller
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Feature Strings
Ian Hickson
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Chris Wilson
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Dão Gottwald
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
Chris Wilson
RE: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Chris Wilson
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Sander van Lambalgen
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Christian Schmidt
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Feature Strings
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Sean Fraser
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Feature Strings
Jeff Schiller
Feature Strings
Jeff Schiller
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
Brad Fults
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Magnus Kristiansen
Re: Issue Tracking (was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Dão Gottwald
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Murray Maloney
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles
Murray Maloney
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
Håkon Wium Lie
specification name [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5]
Dailey, David P.
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Matthew Raymond
Re: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5])
Dão Gottwald
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
James Graham
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Julian Reschke
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Patrick Taylor
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Henri Sivonen
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Eolas vs. <object>
Laurens Holst
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Anne van Kesteren
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Karl Dubost
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
Dan Connolly
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Dylan Smith
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
Dan Connolly
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Lachlan Hunt
RE: quality of authoring tools' output
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Sean Fraser
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Eolas vs. <object>
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal
Dannii
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
Lachlan Hunt
Issue Tracking (was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
Doug Schepers
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Anne van Kesteren
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
Ian Hickson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5])
Elliott Sprehn
Wednesday, 18 April 2007
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
Dan Connolly
Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey)
Dan Connolly
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey)
Ian Hickson
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles
Doug Schepers
RE: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5])
Dan Connolly
supplemental HTML WG orientation teleconference (same survey)
Dan Connolly
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
James Graham
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
Dan Connolly
RE: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5])
Sander Tekelenburg
HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey)
Dan Connolly
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: several messages on versioning
Ian Hickson
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles
Doug Schepers
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
Dan Connolly
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Henri Sivonen
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
Henri Sivonen
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Michael A. Puls II
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles
Doug Schepers
about this mailing list
Marvin Carlos
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
Dan Connolly
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Jonas Sicking
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
Sean Fraser
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Bill Mason
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
Terje Bless
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Matthew Ratzloff
RE: Microsoft versioning proposal
Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Chris Wilson
RE: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Chris Wilson
Tuesday, 17 April 2007
Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome!
ben@hedrington.com
Wednesday, 18 April 2007
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Jeff Schiller
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
liorean
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Michael A. Puls II
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
David Dailey
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Henri Sivonen
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Henri Sivonen
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Julian Reschke
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Michael A. Puls II
Re: Introduce <term> element
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Magnus Kristiansen
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Matthew Raymond
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Ian Hickson
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Andrew Sidwell
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Dão Gottwald
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Dão Gottwald
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
Henri Sivonen
Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Roger Johansson
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Dannii
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Jeff Schiller
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Anne van Kesteren
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Jeff Schiller
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Anne van Kesteren
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Ian Hickson
static and dinamic schemes
Dmitry Turin
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Jeff Schiller
RE: Request for Decision: Design Principles
Dailey, David P.
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Ian Hickson
A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
Jeff Schiller
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Karl Dubost
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Dylan Smith
Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
Maciej Stachowiak
Request for Decision: Design Principles
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Karl Dubost
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Dailey, David P.
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Karl Dubost
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Simon Pieters
RE: Eolas vs. <object>
Dailey, David P.
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Anne van Kesteren
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Karl Dubost
The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
Matthew Raymond
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Karl Dubost
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
L. David Baron
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal
Dannii
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Boris Zbarsky
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Murray Maloney
RE: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
Dailey, David P.
Tuesday, 17 April 2007
Re: [XBL Primer] new scenarios
John Boyer
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Dão Gottwald
Re: Eolas vs. <object>
Karl Dubost
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Henk-Jan de Boer
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal
Dão Gottwald
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Henk-Jan de Boer
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
David Håsäther
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Dão Gottwald
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
Marcos Caceres
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Simon Pieters
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
RE: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Dão Gottwald
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Doug Schepers
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Maciej Stachowiak
RE: Microsoft versioning proposal
Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and the end user
Boris Zbarsky
Re: Versioning and the end user
Maciej Stachowiak
RE: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Chris Wilson
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
Henrik Dvergsdal
RE: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and the end user
Chris Wilson
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Matthew Ratzloff
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Jonas Sicking
Re: Versioning and the end user
Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Dão Gottwald
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Henri Sivonen
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
David Hyatt
Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
Henri Sivonen
RE: Versioning and html[5]
Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5]
Chris Wilson
If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
Maciej Stachowiak
Eolas vs. <object>
Jeff Schiller
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Doug Schepers
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
liorean
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Jonas Sicking
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Bruce Boughton
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Roger Johansson
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and the end user
Boris Zbarsky
Re: Versioning and the end user
Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Dão Gottwald
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Boris Zbarsky
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
James Graham
Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome!
Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
liorean
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Boris Zbarsky
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
James Graham
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
David Dailey
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
liorean
Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome!
David Dailey
RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome!
Ben Adida
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Dão Gottwald
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Dão Gottwald
Monday, 16 April 2007
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Shane Thacker
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
Henk-Jan de Boer
Tuesday, 17 April 2007
Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Ian Hickson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Henri Sivonen
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Dannii
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Ian Hickson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
cadunn
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Murray Maloney
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Dylan Smith
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Matthew Raymond
Re: Versioning and the end user
Boris Zbarsky
Versioning and the end user
Preston L. Bannister
Monday, 16 April 2007
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Tuesday, 17 April 2007
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Ian Hickson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
T.V Raman
Monday, 16 April 2007
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
David Hyatt
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Bruce Boughton
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Bruce Boughton
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
T.V Raman
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
cadunn
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Murray Maloney
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Murray Maloney
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Ian Hickson
RE: Versioning and html[5]
Ian Hickson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5
Terje Bless
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Dão Gottwald
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Ian Hickson
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Arthur Jennings
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Ian Hickson
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
David Hyatt
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Ian Hickson
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Murray Maloney
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
liorean
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Murray Maloney
RE: Versioning and html[5]
Chris Wilson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Joe D'Andrea
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Kornel Lesinski
Re: Non-goal for HTML: A Graphics API
Ariel Perez
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Dan Connolly
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
David Dailey
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
David Hyatt
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Non-goal for HTML: A Graphics API
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles]
David Dailey
Non-goal for HTML: A Graphics API
Murray Maloney
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Jeff Cutsinger
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
T.V Raman
Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
Murray Maloney
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Chris Wilson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Doug Schepers
usability testing [was: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>]
David Dailey
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
T.V Raman
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Henri Sivonen
RE: Versioning and html[5]
Joe D'Andrea
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
James Graham
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Julian Reschke
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Dannii
Sunday, 15 April 2007
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
Philip Taylor
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
aurélien levy
Monday, 16 April 2007
Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
Matthew Raymond
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Dão Gottwald
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Henri Sivonen
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
Dão Gottwald
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Dão Gottwald
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
Dão Gottwald
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
Dão Gottwald
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
Henri Sivonen
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Mike Schinkel
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
James Graham
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <i