W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:22:19 +0900
Message-ID: <461CE10B.5070606@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren schreef:
>
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:49:14 +0200, Laurens Holst 
> <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl> wrote:
>> That said, I don’t have any particular objections against integrating
>> the WHATWG’s specs as a whole. I only fear that with things like for
>> example <video> already having proactively been added to the published
>> specification draft, implementations even being made already, it will be
>> hard for me to effectively argue that <object> should be used.
>
> Do you think that would be different if only parts of HTML5 would be 
> taken over? The people currently involved in <video> seem to be mostly 
> on both WGs. 

My primary concern with <video> in this case is that <video> has already 
been added to the working draft of the spec. I hope that in the HTML WG 
this would be done differently, splitting it up in separate issues for 
discussion, maybe prototype a couple of specs in the wiki or something, 
and only after some kind of concensus has been reached add it to the 
specification’s working draft.


~Grauw

-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.


Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 13:24:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:42 UTC