Anne van Kesteren schreef: > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:49:14 +0200, Laurens Holst > <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl> wrote: >> That said, I don’t have any particular objections against integrating >> the WHATWG’s specs as a whole. I only fear that with things like for >> example <video> already having proactively been added to the published >> specification draft, implementations even being made already, it will be >> hard for me to effectively argue that <object> should be used. > > Do you think that would be different if only parts of HTML5 would be > taken over? The people currently involved in <video> seem to be mostly > on both WGs. My primary concern with <video> in this case is that <video> has already been added to the working draft of the spec. I hope that in the HTML WG this would be done differently, splitting it up in separate issues for discussion, maybe prototype a couple of specs in the wiki or something, and only after some kind of concensus has been reached add it to the specification’s working draft. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 13:24:02 UTC