Matt Freels wrote: >If the problem is that IE.next must deal with the fact that authors >haven't addressed the fact that some future version of IE might >actually be fully standards-compliant, I don't think that forcing the >HTML5 spec to cope is appropriate, or even going to help. If, for Never said it would, or asked the HTML5 spec to solve this for me. >Wouldn't this breakage be mitigated by allowing users to manually >fall back on IE7 when needed? No, that would be punishing IE users. My mom doesn't understand why one site needs IE7 and one needs IE8. -ChrisReceived on Sunday, 15 April 2007 01:19:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:53 GMT