On Apr 10, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote: > > This seems okay. I do have one concern regarding his comments that > the WHATWG will continue development of their spec separately. > Others have already made comments that "Hixie's time would be > better spent..." and it seems that if his time is better spent > doing anything its working on this spec and not the WHAT WG spec > since that's going to be largely a redundant task. My hope is that both specs can be the same document. The W3C has done this sort of thing before, with Web Forms 2 and XBL2. Other standards organizations have done joint standards before as well, for instance AVC/H.264 is a joint effort between the ISO and the ITU. In the worst case, Ian has already said he wants to keep the WHATWG spec strictly a compatible superset and I think that is a worthy goal. Regards, MaciejReceived on Tuesday, 10 April 2007 23:01:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:39:46 GMT