- From: Dao Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:37:59 +0200
- To: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote: >> Actually, I'd rather introduce <blockcode>, because that's really >> missing. > > Let's get <blockspan> <div> > <blockstrong>, <blockem> Well, there would actually be some (rare) use cases. But semantically, there's no difference between <blockstrong><p>...<p>...</blockstrong> and <p><strong>...</strong><p><strong>...</strong>. > <blockimg>, <blockinput> IMG and INPUT don't have child nodes. > <blockins>, <blockdel> From the HTML 4.01 spec regarding INS and DEL: "These two elements are unusual for HTML in that they may serve as either block-level or inline elements (but not both)." > <blocklabel> <blocksup>, <blocksub>, and > <blockvar> Block-level child nodes make hardly sense for those. > If <blockcode> and <blockquote> really are > that semantically different from their inline cousins, then all of the > other inline elements should have block-level equivalents as well, don't > you agree? No.
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2007 10:38:07 UTC