Murray Maloney wrote: > you will note the charter says that the WG 'will not assume that an SGML parser > is used'. We are not required to gratuitously break compatibility with HTML > as an SGML application, We are required to retain compatibility with the web, which, as a consequence, means we simply cannot retain compatibility with the idea of HTML as an application of SGML. > nor are we expected to eschew XML. We're not eschewing XML. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/Received on Friday, 13 April 2007 14:56:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:53 GMT