Re: Version information

Murray Maloney wrote:
> you will note the charter says that the WG 'will not assume that an SGML parser
> is used'. We are not required to gratuitously break compatibility with HTML
> as an SGML application,

We are required to retain compatibility with the web, which, as a 
consequence, means we simply cannot retain compatibility with the idea 
of HTML as an application of SGML.

>  nor are we expected to eschew XML.

We're not eschewing XML.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/

Received on Friday, 13 April 2007 14:56:47 UTC