I agree. And, well-done all. Clair Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > Dear HTML Working Group, > > HTML5, comprising the Web Apps 1.0 and Web Forms 2.0 specifications, > is the product of many years of collaborative effort. It specifies > existing HTML4 markup and APIs with much clearer conformance criteria > for both implementations and documents. It specifies many useful > additions, in many cases drawing on features that have existed in > browser-based implementations for a long time. And it actively draws > on feedback from implementors and content authors. Therefore, we the > undersigned propose the following: > > - that the W3C HTML Working Group adops the WHAT Working Group's HTML5 > as the starting point for further HTML development > - that the W3C's next-generation HTML specification is officially > named "HTML 5" > - that Ian Hickson is named as editor for the W3C's HTML 5 > specification, to preserve continuity with the existing WHATWG effort > > If HTML5 is adopted as a starting point, the contents of the document > would still be up for review and revision, but we would start with the > existing text. A suitable next step might be a high-level review of > functionality added and removed relative to HTML4.01, followed by > focused discussion and review of individual topic areas, including > both content already in the spec and proposed new features. > Discussions should be guided by common principles along the lines of > <http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ProposedDesignPrinciples> > > If the group is agreeable to these proposals, Apple, Mozilla and Opera > will agree to arrange a non-exclusive copyright assignment to the W3 > Consortium for HTML5 specifications. > > > L. David Baron, Mozilla Foundation > Lars Erik Bolstad, Opera Software ASA > Brendan Eich, Mozilla Foundation > Dave Hyatt, Apple Inc. > Håkon Wium Lie, Opera Software ASA > Maciej Stachowiak, Apple Inc. > >Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:48:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:52 GMT