Looking at HTML5’s definitions of <i> and <b>, and in particular, the examples, I notice the following: > The examples below show uses of the i element: > > <p>The <i>felis silvestris catus</i> is cute.</p> > <p>The <i>block-level elements</i> are defined above.</p> > <p>There is a certain <i lang="fr">je ne sais quoi</i> in the air.</p> and > The following example shows a use of the b element to highlight key > words without marking them up as important: > > <p>The <b>frobonitor</b> and <b>barbinator</b> components are fried.</p> If you look at these examples, they are really all just foreign or scientific or other types of terms that are accentuated (using either bold or italics) as a means to help the user understand that. The second example of the <i> element could be covered by the <dfn> element. <dfn> means ‘the defining instance of a term’. However, what all these examples have in common is that basically, they are all using a term without defining it, or want to highlight additional instances of the term as well. In other words, <dfn> is too limited to be applied to all terms, and thus currently <i> is used instead. So, in order to fill this gap, I suggest a <term> element is introduced, as an accompaniment for <dfn>. This will cover a lot of cases where <i> is used and <em> is inappropriate. I think it is generic enough to deserve its own element, as opposed to making <i> and <b> catch-all elements and defining several overlapping meanings for them. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 07:22:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:52 GMT