- From: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:12:40 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 12. apr. 2007, at 23.41, Simon Pieters wrote: > 1. It is a valid SGML doctype (FWIW). Well, I don't have access to the SGML standard so I cannot check on this, but using a DOCTYPE declaration without reference to a Formal identifier/DTD is pretty useless and I think a standard like this should have a formal identifier. > 2. You don't need a doctype in XML. No, you can refer to a schema instead, but if you use one it should conform to the SGML standard. -- Henrik
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 22:13:05 UTC