- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 20:32:39 -0700
- To: bfults@gmail.com
- Cc: raman@google.com, giovanni.gentili@gmail.com, public-html@w3.org
After all it's just soup:-) Sounds pretty nutty to have a version number for it:-) --- but then again perhaps it's a soup to nuts story ... Brad Fults writes: > On 4/3/07, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > And I thought version numbers were out of fashion :-) > > That's actually an interesting question if one of the principles that > is going to be adhered to is lack of version syntax [1]. Should the > language specification itself have a version? > > Could it just end up being "HTML"? Are other acronyms precluded by the > group charter? > > [1] - http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ProposedDesignPrinciples#head-4a3dff6ff01c60eb72d8fa8ee1d0c2540e40ff8c > > -- > Brad Fults -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ Google: tv+raman GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 03:32:58 UTC