W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: HTML5 vs HTML6

From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 20:32:39 -0700
Message-ID: <17939.7255.897370.930680@retriever.corp.google.com>
To: bfults@gmail.com
Cc: raman@google.com, giovanni.gentili@gmail.com, public-html@w3.org


After all it's just soup:-) Sounds pretty nutty to have a version
number for it:-) --- but then again perhaps it's a soup to nuts
story ...

Brad Fults writes:
 > On 4/3/07, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote:
 > >
 > >
 > > And I thought version numbers were out of fashion :-)
 > 
 > That's actually an interesting question if one of the principles that
 > is going to be adhered to is lack of version syntax [1]. Should the
 > language specification itself have a version?
 > 
 > Could it just end up being "HTML"? Are other acronyms precluded by the
 > group charter?
 > 
 > [1] - http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ProposedDesignPrinciples#head-4a3dff6ff01c60eb72d8fa8ee1d0c2540e40ff8c
 > 
 > -- 
 > Brad Fults

-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

Title:  Research Scientist      
Email:  raman@google.com
WWW:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
Google: tv+raman 
GTalk:  raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
PGP:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 03:32:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:42 UTC