W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)

From: Dylan Smith <qstage@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:55:28 -0700
To: <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C24309D0.2AE4%qstage@cox.net>

on 4/11/07 8:03 PM, Bruce Boughton at bruce@bruceboughton.me.uk wrote:

> I don't think this is the right
> time to pander to poor (w.r.t standards) authoring.

While the value/validity of the various elements is open to debate, one
thing v.5 ought to be is a real standard. While backwards compatability is
important, laying out proper usage will make everyone's lives easier in the
long run. Ever tried to CSS a site someone else structured poorly? 
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 07:01:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:18 UTC