Le 12 avr. 2007 à 07:00, Maciej Stachowiak a écrit : > The spec itself should mainly try to address implementors of user > agents (including browsers, search engines, data mining tools, > etc), conformance checkers and authoring tools, since these > audiences need a significant amount of precision. > > A simpler guide for authors might be a useful addendum, and of > course we definitely want exhaustive test cases. With a bit of scripting, (and/or wikification), there might be a possibility for having something ala PHP documentation. One of the cool things of PHP documentation is the breakdown of each feature with contributions from people. So not in the official specification but an annotated version of the new specification. Something similar had been done in the past with the [annotated XML Specification][1] by Tim Bray. [1]: http://www.xml.com/axml/testaxml.htm -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 00:54:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:53 GMT