- From: Mike Schinkel <w3c-lists@mikeschinkel.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 03:56:44 -0400
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer wrote: > > The issue I've seen it that one group comes to consensus, passes it > over to the other group, the other group starts discussion again, > comes to a new consensus that may be different, passes it back to the > first group, the first group that already reached consensus re-starts > discussion, comes to a different consensus, passes it over... > > Alternatively, one group comes to consensus, passes it over to the > other group saying "no changes possible, just sign off please" to > avoid endless loops as described before. > > Clearly, both approaches aren't optimal. This is an organizational > problem that is completely independent from whether or not the liaison > person between the groups or joint editor is doing a great job or not, > nor am I suggesting that isolation is therefore a great idea. Well said. This was the problem that I saw. -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org http://atlanta-web.org - http://t.oolicio.us "It never ceases to amaze how many people will proactively debate away attempts to improve the web..."
Received on Monday, 9 April 2007 07:57:06 UTC