Re: wg members status

I also think the old system works fine.
Maybe it would help to display all mails from a user or a counting of them
in the memberlist

PS: Sorry too.

On 4/12/07, Davide Oliva <davide@innovatedesign.it> wrote:
>
>
> I'm new on the list and, first of all, I would like to greet all
> subscribers.
>
> Daniel Glazman:
>
> > what I have in mind : have two different status for people in this WG,
> > "participant" and "observer". Everyone is "observer" by default, meaning
> > you're receiving the mailing-list. Only "participants" can post to the
> > mailing-list.
>
> I agree with you about huge numbers of this list, Daniel, but IMHO I
> think that there's no real advantages in that you have suggested.
> In fact I suppose that who have subscribed the mailing-list are really
> interested in the argument of this working group.
> Everyone of us should be partecipate to the list without any
> restriction, until his contribution is on topic.
> My two cents, obviously.
> Davide.
>
> P.S. Sorry for my poor english.
>
>
>
>


-- 
Greetings, Stefan
http://stefan2904.blogspot.com