- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 14:00:24 +0300
- To: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Apr 13, 2007, at 23:14, Henrik Dvergsdal wrote: > On 13. apr. 2007, at 11.50, Henri Sivonen wrote: > >> The schema (RELAX NG and Schematron) is an implementation detail. >> It has no normative standing whatsoever (and, in my opinion, >> should not have). Moreover, the schema *cannot* cover all (X)HTML5 >> conformance requirements. > > Can you elaborate on this please? > (Or point me to somewhere where this is described) http://hsivonen.iki.fi/thesis/html5-conformance-checker.xhtml#non-schema http://hsivonen.iki.fi/thesis/html5-conformance-checker.xhtml#more- non-schema > What conformance requirements cannot be covered by the schema? In general, anything that cannot be tested by seeing if a given document tree can be derived in a regular tree grammar and that cannot be tested by evaluating an XPath expression. The most interesting example is table integrity. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Saturday, 14 April 2007 11:00:39 UTC