W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Version information

From: ryan <ryan@theryanking.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:01:26 -0700
Message-Id: <C82DCB62-8516-44E5-ACC7-ED9745B22F7B@theryanking.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
To: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>

On Apr 12, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Henrik Dvergsdal wrote:
> On 12. apr. 2007, at 23.36, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>> SGML/XML aren't relevant to this discussion, as we're not talking  
>> about
>> the SGML or XML serialisations of HTML, but the text/html  
>> serialistion.
>
> As far as I know text/html is the MIME type of the SGML and XML  
> serializations of HTML.
>
> Are you planning to make a standard that is not based on SGML and XML?

If we accept the WHAT-WG's latest draft, then yes:

from http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#parsing:

> While the HTML form of HTML5 bears a close resemblance to SGML and  
> XML, it is a separate language with its own parsing rules.
>
> Some earlier versions of HTML (in particular from HTML2 to HTML4)  
> were based on SGML and used SGML parsing rules. However, few (if  
> any) web browsers ever implemented true SGML parsing for HTML  
> documents; the only user agents to strictly handle HTML as an SGML  
> application have historically been validators. The resulting  
> confusion  with validators claiming documents to have one  
> representation while widely deployed Web browsers interoperably  
> implemented a different representation  has resulted in this  
> version of HTML returning to a non-SGML basis.
>
> Authors interested in using SGML tools in their authoring pipeline  
> are encouraged to use the XML serialisation of HTML5 instead of the  
> HTML serialisation.

-ryan
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 22:01:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:53 GMT