W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Level of specification detail

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:59:27 +0200
To: liorean <liorean@gmail.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.tqnxxdgl64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:58:30 +0200, liorean <liorean@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/04/07, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>> In my opinion:
>>
>> The spec itself should mainly try to address implementors of user
>> agents (including browsers, search engines, data mining tools, etc),
>> conformance checkers and authoring tools, since these audiences need
>> a significant amount of precision.
>>
>> A simpler guide for authors might be a useful addendum, and of course
>> we definitely want exhaustive test cases.
>
> I'm fine with the spec mostly addressing implementors, though I think
> there is a strong need for authors to have some kind of official and
> complete guide/reference.

Authoring requirements are made as those are necessary for both  
conformance checkers and authoring tools. I would expect people to extract  
those and create tutorials for various kind of audiences (coming from  
HTML4, coming from XML, no experience, etc.).


> Something like the elements/attributes tables of HTML4.01 is enough,
> it just needs to be there somewhere.

I agree that the specification should have appendices listing those. I  
would expect this to happen when the specification is mostly done though,  
not directly. For now Simon Pieters is maintaining this page:

   http://simon.html5.org/html5-elements
   (It lists all elements and attributes.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 08:59:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:42 UTC