- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:32:42 +1000
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, "David Hyatt" <hyatt@apple.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:26:19 +1000, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: > As I said in the past, even if done by this WG, I have the feeling that > it would speed up the process to make it a small individual > specification. As an example, Web API has been quite quick for > XMLHttpRequest Object. As editor of that specification, I'm not really convinced. I suppose it did help Hixie to focus on other issues though. What we need however, is a volunteer, not a suggestion of where it can be done better. > # The XMLHttpRequest Object > > * first draft at W3C > W3C Working Draft 05 April 2006 > * Last Call > W3C Working Draft 27 February 2007 > > Given the nature of implementations of Canvas, it should be quite quick > to go through CR, given the number of tests available. > The issues lists count only one open issue. > http://www.w3.org/2006/webapi/track/products/3 > http://www.w3.org/2006/webapi/track/products/8 That list is not complete. There are some outstanding LC comments that have yet to be addressed. There are also some outstanding questions that implementors have not answered yet. > I don't know when Anne and Web API WG is planning to call for CR. Second LC whenever I get around to solve the existing issues. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 02:33:35 UTC