- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:44:43 -0500
- To: "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>
- Cc: sean@elementary-group.com, Nick Fitzsimons <nick@nickfitz.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 16:11 -0400, Dailey, David P. wrote: > On Thu 4/26/2007 1:37 PM Sean Fraser wrote: > > >The survey I propose would - simply - have Pass/Fail criteria; HTML5 would > > include error numbers and issues. > > The reasons I joined the ongoing discussion of methodology here a > few notes back (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Apr/1453.html) > may stem from my misunderstanding about why we are surveying the > top 200 web sites to begin with. The first reference to it I can see > appears on DanC's agenda (http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16) as > > "One idea from a chat with Chris W. is to survey the top 200 web sites regularly." > > listed under Proposed Design Principles. Oops; I can see how that might be misleading. The survey idea is related to the market threshold requirement, in my mind. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 21:44:52 UTC