Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5

From: Josef Spillner <spillner@rn.inf.tu-dresden.de> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:14:24 +0200 To: public-html@w3.org Message-Id: <200704111214.25278.spillner@rn.inf.tu-dresden.de> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:39:46 GMT

Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 04:10 schrieben Sie:
> HTML 4 is so underspecified it's a miracle it's even implemented.
> And I am one of the few here (with Murray, Chris and Dan) who were
> already here in the HTML WG for HTML 4.

Has there ever been an analysis of why this happened? I would be interested to 
know if the spec was already considered vague at the time of finishing the 
draft, or if it was granting too much freedom to implementors.

Josef