W3C home
>
Mailing lists
>
Public
>
public-html@w3.org
>
April 2007
public-html@w3.org from April 2007 by author
1773 messages
:
Starting
Sunday, 1 April 2007 00:04:27 GMT,
Ending
Monday, 30 April 2007 23:57:52 GMT
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Mail actions
: [
mail a new topic
]
Help
: [
How to use the archives
] [
Search in the archives
]
Alexander Graf
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Friday, 20 April)
Update on affiliation
(Friday, 20 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: Form fields for uploading
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Form fields for uploading
(Monday, 2 April)
Form fields for uploading
(Monday, 2 April)
Alexey Feldgendler
Re: Posting to this list
(Monday, 2 April)
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Saturday, 7 April)
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Saturday, 7 April)
Re: Version information
(Saturday, 7 April)
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Thursday, 5 April)
Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: Canvas
(Sunday, 8 April)
Re: Canvas
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Canvas (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Friday, 6 April)
Andrew Sidwell
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Andrew Stibbard
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
(Sunday, 29 April)
Andy Hume
Re: wg members status
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: beforeprint event
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Friday, 6 April)
Anne van Kesteren
Re: Meta-question : why so few "Re: " subjects ?
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
(Sunday, 29 April)
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
(Saturday, 28 April)
Re: missing principle
(Saturday, 28 April)
Design principles: added three examples
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
(Thursday, 26 April)
About the Web Forms 2 proposal
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: survey of top web sites
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: BoF at XTech
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: BoF at XTech
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: HTML/XHTML
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: denying users direct access to document source
(Friday, 13 April)
Microsoft versioning proposal
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Level of specification detail
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Canvas
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Version information
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Version information
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: beforeprint event
(Monday, 9 April)
beforeprint event (was: Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Version information
(Saturday, 7 April)
Re: Canvas
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Version information
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated ("don't break the web" vs respecting MIME types)
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: <table type="rowsortable">
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: deprecate HR; replace with LS (logical seperator)
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Naming Wiki Pages
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Sunday, 1 April)
Ariel Perez
Re: Non-goal for HTML: A Graphics API
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: wg members status
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: wg members status
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: wg members status
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Arthur Jennings
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Saturday, 21 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Versioning of HTML fragments
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Versioning of HTML fragments
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet)
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Sunday, 1 April)
Default (informal) Style Sheet
(Sunday, 1 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles
(Sunday, 1 April)
Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
(Sunday, 1 April)
Re: Multipart response support
(Sunday, 1 April)
aurélien levy
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Sunday, 15 April)
Ben Adida
RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome!
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Ben Meadowcroft
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Thursday, 12 April)
Ben Ward
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
ben@hedrington.com
Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome!
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Benjamin Chait
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Current working draft
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5])
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: wg members status
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Form fields for uploading
(Monday, 2 April)
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Sunday, 22 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Thursday, 12 April)
Benjamin West
Re: survey of top web sites
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: survey of top web sites
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
(Friday, 13 April)
bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: missing principle
(Saturday, 28 April)
Re: missing principle
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Bill Mason
Re: Feature Strings
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development
(Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Boris Zbarsky
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Versioning and the end user
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Versioning and the end user
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Versioning and the end user
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information)
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Version information
(Saturday, 7 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Brad Fults
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development
(Saturday, 21 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: HTML5 vs HTML6
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Brian Suda
Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Bruce Boughton
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: small consultation
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5])
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: <table type="rowsortable">
(Sunday, 8 April)
Re: <table type="rowsortable">
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: <table type="rowsortable">
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Bruce Lawson
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
(Sunday, 29 April)
cadunn
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Cameron McCormack
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Carol King
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Charles Hinshaw
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Thursday, 5 April)
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: Eolas vs. <object>
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout
(Monday, 9 April)
Charles Ying
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Saturday, 21 April)
Chasen Le Hara
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Chris Wilson
RE: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Friday, 27 April)
RE: HTML5 proposal response
(Monday, 23 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
(Friday, 20 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
(Friday, 20 April)
HTML5 proposal response
(Thursday, 19 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
(Thursday, 19 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
(Thursday, 19 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode|
(Thursday, 19 April)
RE: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
(Thursday, 19 April)
RE: Microsoft versioning proposal
(Wednesday, 18 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
RE: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
RE: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
(Tuesday, 17 April)
RE: Microsoft versioning proposal
(Tuesday, 17 April)
RE: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
(Tuesday, 17 April)
RE: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
RE: Versioning and the end user
(Tuesday, 17 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 16 April)
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 16 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 16 April)
oops
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Patents and public
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information)
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Patents and public (was: RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information)
(Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information)
(Thursday, 12 April)
Patents and public (was: RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
(Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information)
(Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
RE: beforeprint event
(Monday, 9 April)
RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 9 April)
RE: beforeprint event
(Monday, 9 April)
RE: Version information
(Monday, 9 April)
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Monday, 9 April)
RE: Version information
(Monday, 9 April)
RE: Version information
(Monday, 9 April)
RE: Version information
(Saturday, 7 April)
RE: Version information
(Friday, 6 April)
RE: Version information
(Friday, 6 April)
RE: Canvas
(Friday, 6 April)
RE: Version information
(Friday, 6 April)
RE: CSS for print (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Friday, 6 April)
RE: Version information (was Re: HTML5 vs HTML6)
(Friday, 6 April)
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Friday, 6 April)
RE: Mandated Video Format
(Friday, 6 April)
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: Mandated Video Format
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet)
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet)
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: semantics [was Re: Proposed Design Principles updated]
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: HTML5 vs HTML6
(Wednesday, 4 April)
RE: Let every element have a src attribute
(Wednesday, 4 April)
RE: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
RE: Proposed Design Principles updated ("don't break the web" vs respecting MIME types)
(Wednesday, 4 April)
RE: <table type="rowsortable">
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Christian Schmidt
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Thursday, 19 April)
Craig Saila
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Dailey, David P.
RE: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Sunday, 29 April)
Another look at the Proposed Design Principles
(Sunday, 29 April)
Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content
(Friday, 27 April)
RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view
(Friday, 27 April)
RE: survey of top web sites
(Friday, 27 April)
RE: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review
(Thursday, 26 April)
RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view
(Thursday, 26 April)
RE: survey of top web sites
(Thursday, 26 April)
RE: Proposed Design Principles review
(Thursday, 26 April)
RE: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
(Thursday, 26 April)
non-rectangular images & <img> tag
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Sunday, 22 April)
RE: HTML5 proposal response
(Friday, 20 April)
specification name [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5]
(Thursday, 19 April)
RE: Request for Decision: Design Principles
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
(Wednesday, 18 April)
RE: Eolas vs. <object>
(Wednesday, 18 April)
RE: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 16 April)
legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Current working draft
(Saturday, 14 April)
Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles]
(Friday, 13 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue
(Wednesday, 11 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue
(Tuesday, 10 April)
RE: innerHTML and setTimeout
(Tuesday, 10 April)
<table> terse mode for data entry
(Sunday, 8 April)
RE: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names
(Sunday, 8 April)
Canvas [was RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group]
(Sunday, 8 April)
RE: <table type="rowsortable">
(Sunday, 8 April)
RE: Mandated Video Format
(Friday, 6 April)
RE: GIF was -- Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Thursday, 5 April)
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Thursday, 5 April)
<table type="rowsortable">
(Wednesday, 4 April)
semantics [was Re: Proposed Design Principles updated]
(Wednesday, 4 April)
RE: Why Have Design Principles? (was Re: Design Principles Document update)
(Monday, 2 April)
Dan Connolly
HTML5 as our specification text for review? (formal question WBS survey)
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: missing principle
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review
(Thursday, 26 April)
RE: survey of top web sites
(Thursday, 26 April)
HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review
(Thursday, 26 April)
scribe for today's teleconference?
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: Let use this convention for conversation
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z (invited participants)
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z
(Wednesday, 25 April)
agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z
(Wednesday, 25 April)
HTML version issue summary?
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert
(Tuesday, 24 April)
survey of top web sites
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: Other roles we should fill (survey on tasks and roles)
(Tuesday, 24 April)
FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey)
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
RE: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5])
(Wednesday, 18 April)
supplemental HTML WG orientation teleconference (same survey)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Wednesday, 18 April)
HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 16 April)
taking threads to www-archive or offline altogether
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Version information
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (patent policy FAQ))
(Thursday, 12 April)
splitting HTML5 into chunks [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5]
(Wednesday, 11 April)
tasks to supplement HTML specification development
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Care with subject lines and threads [was: Proposal to Adopt ...]
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue
(Tuesday, 10 April)
RE: Mandated Video Format
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated ("don't break the web" vs respecting MIME types)
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
no HTML WG meeting around XTech
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Naming Wiki Pages
(Monday, 2 April)
Daniel Glazman
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
(Sunday, 29 April)
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
(Sunday, 29 April)
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
(Sunday, 29 April)
Re: Hand-coding HTML
(Sunday, 29 April)
Re: missing principle
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: missing principle
(Friday, 27 April)
missing principle
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: HTML5 proposal response
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors)
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 23 April)
regrets
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: wg members status
(Wednesday, 11 April)
wg members status
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: semantics [was Re: Proposed Design Principles updated]
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet)
(Monday, 2 April)
Daniel Schattenkirchner
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names
(Thursday, 5 April)
Daniel Spång
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
(Thursday, 26 April)
Dannii
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Sunday, 29 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Monday, 16 April)
Dao Gottwald
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: beforeprint event
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: beforeprint event
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: beforeprint event
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Canvas
(Sunday, 8 April)
Re: rel=noreferrer
(Sunday, 8 April)
Re: Version information
(Sunday, 8 April)
Re: Version information
(Saturday, 7 April)
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names
(Saturday, 7 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: <table type="rowsortable">
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Form fields for uploading
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Monday, 2 April)
Dave Raggett
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
(Saturday, 28 April)
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
(Friday, 27 April)
Dublin workshop on web authoring
(Thursday, 26 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 16 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5]
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: CSS for print (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Friday, 6 April)
Links to DOM Ranges (was Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML)
(Wednesday, 4 April)
David Dailey
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: task list
(Sunday, 29 April)
Re: survey of top web sites
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: survey of top web sites
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Friday, 20 April)
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome!
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles]
(Monday, 16 April)
usability testing [was: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>]
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: brainstorm: lines and existing html-elements
(Wednesday, 11 April)
access to client-side files [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue]
(Wednesday, 11 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
innerHTML and setTimeout
(Monday, 9 April)
style.background rendering - browser inconsistency
(Tuesday, 3 April)
David Hyatt
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Canvas
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Canvas
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
David Håsäther
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Version information
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Version information
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Version information
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development
(Wednesday, 11 April)
David McFarland
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Davide Oliva
Re: wg members status
(Thursday, 12 April)
Debi Orton
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
(Friday, 27 April)
Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: [public-html] <none>
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Saturday, 21 April)
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute
(Monday, 2 April)
deres
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re[4]: New html-element: table3
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
(Thursday, 26 April)
INPUT-PIC form control
(Thursday, 26 April)
Let use this convention for conversation
(Thursday, 26 April)
Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
(Thursday, 26 April)
Fwd: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
(Thursday, 26 April)
Fwd: Re[4]: New html-element: table3
(Thursday, 26 April)
Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3
(Thursday, 26 April)
How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re[4]: new form control
(Tuesday, 24 April)
brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re[2]: New html-element: table3
(Tuesday, 24 April)
New html-element: table3
(Tuesday, 24 April)
New html-element: table3
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column.
(Monday, 23 April)
new form control
(Friday, 20 April)
static and dinamic schemes
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: New discussion group are need
(Friday, 13 April)
New discussion group are need
(Friday, 13 April)
Re[2]: special immediate form: TREE
(Friday, 13 April)
special immediate form: SELECT (LOOKER)
(Friday, 13 April)
special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE
(Friday, 13 April)
small consultation
(Friday, 13 April)
Mask in string of address
(Friday, 13 April)
are necessary tag PACK ?
(Friday, 13 April)
Re[2]: brainstorm: repeating form controls
(Thursday, 12 April)
brainstorm: lines and existing html-elements
(Wednesday, 11 April)
brainstorm: alternative form controls
(Monday, 9 April)
brainstorm: repeating form controls
(Monday, 9 April)
Doug Jones
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Introduce <term> element
(Monday, 9 April)
HTML WG Glossary
(Sunday, 8 April)
Doug Schepers
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
(Sunday, 29 April)
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal
(Sunday, 29 April)
Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Sunday, 22 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Sunday, 22 April)
Issue Tracking (was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Canvas
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Canvas
(Saturday, 7 April)
Re: Canvas
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Canvas
(Friday, 6 April)
Canvas (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Mandated Video Format
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Thursday, 5 April)
Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Posting to this list
(Sunday, 1 April)
Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
(Sunday, 1 April)
Dylan Smith
Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3)
(Saturday, 28 April)
Re: missing principle (small)
(Saturday, 28 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles review
(Saturday, 28 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5)
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Level of specification detail
(Thursday, 12 April)
Dão Gottwald
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary?
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column. But sometimes we need to visualize three tables (for example, database tables) as one table: first table contains names of rows, second table contains names of columns (this table
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Issue Tracking
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Saturday, 21 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Saturday, 21 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
(Saturday, 21 April)
Re: new form control
(Friday, 20 April)
Re: new form control
(Friday, 20 April)
Re: Editor and authors
(Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5])
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome!
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>)
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5])
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
Edward O'Connor
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Elliott Sprehn
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element
(Sunday, 29 April)
Re: Support Existing Content
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Sunday, 22 April)
Re: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5])
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: Introduce <term> element
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: <table> terse mode for data entry
(Sunday, 8 April)
Re: Version information
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Why <video>? (was Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated
(Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: style.background rendering - browser inconsistency
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: style.background rendering - browser inconsistency
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Naming Wiki Pages
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Form fields for uploading
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute
(Monday, 2 April)
Eric Daspet
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Version information
(Thursday, 12 April)
Espen Antonsen - 24SevenOffice
RE:Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group
(Thursday, 5 April)
Gareth Hay
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)
(Monday, 30 April)
Re: [public-html] <none>
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: [public-html] <none>
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Support Existing Content
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: [public-html] <none>
(Friday, 27 April)
[public-html] <none>
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: Support Existing Content
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Geoffrey Sneddon
Parsing of HTML fragments
(Tuesday, 24 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Giovanni Gentili
HTML5 vs HTML6
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt
(Sunday, 22 April)
denying users direct access to document source
(Friday, 13 April)
User Agent (browser) WG at W3C [was: New discussion group are need]
(Friday, 13 April)
argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML
(Monday, 2 April)
deprecate HR; replace with LS (logical seperator)
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
abbreviations in canonical HTML (thoughts & concrete suggestions)
(Monday, 2 April)
Henk-Jan de Boer
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Monday, 16 April)
Henri Sivonen
Re: Support Existing Content
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
(Friday, 27 April)
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!?
(Thursday, 26 April)
Re: Separation of versioning concerns
(Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: New html-element: table3
(Tuesday, 24 April)
BoF at XTech (was: Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech)
(Monday, 23 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
(Friday, 20 April)
Re: Editor and authors
(Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode|
(Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Sunday, 15 April)
Re: HTML/XHTML
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Version information
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5]
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Design Principles updated
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Design Principles updated
(Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail)
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail)
(Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5
(Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: brainstorm: repeating form controls
(Monday, 9 April)
Re: Mandated Video Format
(Friday, 6 April)
Re: Mandated Video Format
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet)
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group)
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet)
(Thursday, 5 April)
Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Superstructure markup
(Monday, 2 April)
Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
(Sunday, 1 April)
Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Editor and authors
(Friday, 20 April)
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
(Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)
(Monday, 16 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate]
(Sunday, 15 April)