W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Eolas vs. <object>

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:28:14 +0900
Message-Id: <1B2680B6-78DC-48E2-BF17-EC4BB45DC343@w3.org>
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>


Le 18 avr. 2007 à 05:35, Jeff Schiller a écrit :
> Out of curiosity, did Microsoft invent the <object> element in the
> first place?

no. For history reading
http://www.webstandards.org/learn/articles/askw3c/jun2004/

See also
* W3C USPTO Section 301 Filing
http://www.w3.org/2003/10/301-filing.html
* HTML+ support for eqn & Postscript
http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/archives/WWW-TALK/www- 
talk-1993q2.messages/467.html
* The REAL proposal for addition to HTML 3.0: EMBED
http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-html.1995q3/0603.html
* Eolas releases WebRouser via the Internet
http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1995q3/0566.html



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:30:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:53 GMT