Hi- Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > Regardless of how many editors there are, I hope we designate some > additional people to be responsible for issue tracking. Agreed. Has there been a discussion (or decision) yet of how we intend to do issue tracking? I think most people here (myself included) would like a public issue tracking system. This would be good to settle before we actually start on the writing or editing of the spec. Does anyone here object to a public issue tracking system? If so, why? Does anyone have a particular issue tracking system they would recommend? If multiple people are going to be responsible for issue tracking, how would the task be carved up? I might be able to carve out some time for logging issues. Regards- -DougReceived on Thursday, 19 April 2007 01:27:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:39:48 GMT