On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Dan Connolly wrote: > > Anyway... if we don't see a whole lot more trust and cooperation than > I've seen lately, we'll either have to leave a bunch of stuff > unspecified or get creative about decision-making processes. For what it's worth, I agree with David that it would be significantly worse to leave things undefined than almost anything else. As editor (of any spec) I don't intend to ever leave anything undefined if it is needed for interoperability. Sometimes not everyone will be happy. There are several things in the WHATWG draft today that aren't what I would like to have, e.g.. But it's more important to have an interoperably implementable spec (for both conforming and nonconforming content) than it is to have everyone happy. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Friday, 27 April 2007 20:33:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:53 GMT