W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: survey of top web sites

From: David Dailey <david.dailey@sru.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:43:33 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>,public-html@w3.org

At 12:26 PM 4/25/2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:05:24 +0200, David Dailey <david.dailey@sru.edu>
>>2. they are more likely to be coded well.
>In my experience with doing QA for web browsers top sites are hardly ever
>coded well. (They also tend to be the more complex sites.)

Interesting... of course any of these sorts of differences would 
limit the generalizability of such a study. Linguists and urologists 
tend to prefer sampling from the middle of the stream, since the 
beginnings and ends both tend to be weird. So long as we're 
discussing alternative methodologies, why not cover a couple more bases?

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 17:44:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:19 UTC