> - that the W3C HTML Working Group adops the WHAT Working Group's > HTML5 as the starting point for further HTML development I don't think that is good idea. I think WHAT Working Group's HTML5 should be audit and only some part of it can be put to W3C draft. > - that the W3C's next-generation HTML specification is officially > named "HTML 5" Totally agree. It's better have one HTML5. > - that Ian Hickson is named as editor for the W3C's HTML 5 > specification, to preserve continuity with the existing WHATWG effort why not someone new? Someone who didn't engage in "old" HTML5. --DominikReceived on Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:48:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:31:53 GMT