On 4/28/07, Mike Schinkel <w3c-lists@mikeschinkel.com> wrote: > > Laurens Holst wrote: > > It carries exactly the same semantics as <dfn>, with the difference > > being that <dfn> is only used on the defining instance of that term, > > and <term> can be used on the other instances. > Who really uses <dfn> anyway?!? Some say it's forgotten [1]. Maybe > that's because it's so obtuse? ;-) I do. It's usefull to present informations like : <dfn>phone number</dfn> : 555 ACME. But I always wondered if that was really in the spec Tao (i read the example as : 555 ACME is a phone number)... -- Olivier G. http://www.lespacedunmatin.info/blog/Received on Sunday, 29 April 2007 16:51:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:39:49 GMT