Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote: > Instead of shoe-horning this into <q>, isn't it better for future > content authors to have a <quote> element that has this functionality > out of the box as well as being able to replace <blockquote>? This makes sense. <q> is mistreated in existing browsers. The problem of inserting quotation marks is too hard-- it should be left alone, at least for now if not forever. <blockquote> is horribly abused by authors. A new element with no hard-coded presentational elements wouldn't have these problems. Jeff Cutsinger
Received on Monday, 2 April 2007 22:24:47 UTC