- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:01:41 +0200
- To: W3C HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 mattraymond@earthlink.net (Matthew Raymond) wrote: >[…] 1. I do not find your bandwidth argument persuasive or relevant. I note that you feel otherwise. 2. I have not, as yet, advocated a specific syntactic construct or model; merely pointed out that it would behoove this WG to fairly and without bias attempt to accommodate the needs of all interests in the web community regardless of whether we personally share their requirements. 3. I believe that in the general it is better to meet relevant requirements (Real Problems) in the standard rather then force individual actors to meet them in a proprietary fashion. 4. I appear to have failed miserably at making myself understood, so I will refrain from contributing further to this particular sub-thread. - -- “You gonna take advice from somebody who slapped DEE BARNES?!” -- eminem -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.8.1 wj8DBQFGKnu0o/I+siR19ewRAhDiAKDkeenHppHxCMlXVH4KJa0ihRXcywCgzTk9 61jDa4r8+J7wNJx2nWryLncV1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Saturday, 21 April 2007 21:01:46 UTC