W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: HTML5 vs HTML6

From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:28:00 -0700
To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5C276AFCCD083E4F94BD5C2DA883F05A27946E6FC2@tk5-exmlt-w600.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com<mailto:bfults@gmail.com?Subject=Re%3A%20HTML5%20vs%20HTML6&In-Reply-To=%253C1959130b0704031958p32aff786v371522df4a7be940%40mail.gmail.com%253E&References=%253C1959130b0704031958p32aff786v371522df4a7be940%40mail.gmail.com%253E>> wrote:

>That's actually an interesting question if one of the principles that

>is going to be adhered to is lack of version syntax [1]. Should the

>language specification itself have a version?

>

>Could it just end up being "HTML"? Are other acronyms precluded by the

>group charter?

>

>[1] - http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ProposedDesignPrinciples#head-4a3dff6ff01c60eb72d8fa8ee1d0c2540e40ff8c



I disagree with that proposed design principle.  Fundamentally, if you add features you are creating a new version.  Firefox 5.0 would implement a different "HTML" than Firefox 7.0.  It would be a mistake not to capture that in version identification.



I do STRONGLY agree with the design principle of additive behavior, and "don't break the web".
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 18:28:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:52 GMT