- From: Matthew Ratzloff <matt@builtfromsource.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
- To: public-html@w3.org
On Fri, April 13, 2007 3:22 pm, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: > On 13 Apr 2007, at 23:02, Matthew Ratzloff wrote: >> On Fri, April 13, 2007 2:55 pm, Arthur Jennings wrote: >>> Perhaps this is a dumb question, but why can't "<!DOCTYPE html>" >>> be that >>> clearly identifiable identifier? I doubt it currently occurs in >>> the wild >>> outside of authors who are anticipating HTML 5. >> >> Safari and Firefox don't recognize "<!DOCTYPE html>" as a valid >> doctype, >> instead bailing out to quirks mode. > > Huh? They do. What they don't recognise is <!DOCTYPE html5>. Whoops! I was thinking of "html5" when I wrote my message. Sorry for any confusion, -Matt
Received on Friday, 13 April 2007 23:17:29 UTC