- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:33:36 +0200
- To: Magnus Kristiansen <magnusrk+w3c@pvv.org>
- CC: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Magnus Kristiansen schrieb: > > On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 04:26:19 +0200, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: > >> As I said in the past, even if done by this WG, I have the feeling >> that it would speed up the process to make it a small individual >> specification. >> As an example, Web API has been quite quick for XMLHttpRequest Object. >> >> # The XMLHttpRequest Object >> >> * first draft at W3C >> W3C Working Draft 05 April 2006 >> * Last Call >> W3C Working Draft 27 February 2007 > > The XHR spec is also a "specify what is currently in use" spec, similar > to what a canvas spec would be. The 10 months to reach first LC > contrasts quite a bit with the earlier message about a canvas standard: Actually, that's not completely true. In some places it specifies "what is currently in use", sometimes not. IMHO, this is one of the bigger problems with that spec: it doesn't offer clean replacement interfaces for things that are broken in (some of) today's implementations... > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 11:33:50 UTC