- From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:30:04 -0700
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
That's not the point, Henri. The point is to have a guide to the Web Apps 1.0 specifications, as the 696 pages are a bit much to internalize all at once; it is useful to have a delta guide to understand what is different between HTML 4.01 and the WHATWG's HTML5. This is the spec we are to publish. As Maciej said: >There is a summary of changes from HTML4 here: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Changes_from_HTML4 -----Original Message----- From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henri Sivonen Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:00 PM To: Henrik Dvergsdal Cc: public-html@w3.org Subject: Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 On Apr 10, 2007, at 21:38, Henrik Dvergsdal wrote: > If we are to make a jump like this, I think it we should have a > really strict delta document. One that we can trust contains all > significant aspects of differences between the HTML4 and HTML5 > specs at all times. From the charter: "A language evolved from HTML4 for describing the semantics of documents and applications on the World Wide Web. This will be a complete specification, not a delta specification." http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter > I think the editor should be responsible for keeping it up to date > as the proposal evolves. That wouldn't be a useful use of Hixie's time. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2007 20:30:17 UTC