- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:05:13 -0700
- To: ian@hixie.ch
- Cc: Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com, public-html@w3.org
If we're talking about HTML producing pixel perfect rendering, then I suggest it's time to press the reset button -- that was never HTML's goal, and nor should it ever become its goal. Ian Hickson writes: > > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > > > Could you give any concrete examples of vagueness? I'd like to fix any > > > that are unintentional. > > > > <canvas>. You've specified an entire immediate-mode graphics api, more > > extensive in some ways than GDI, without describing the parameters or > > giving rendering rules to get interoperable pixel-perfect rendering. > > Could you be more specific? What parameters do you think should be > specified and which rendering rules do you think are needed to get > interoperable pixel-perfect rendering? > > Cheers, > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ Google: tv+raman GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 16:05:45 UTC