Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)

On 13. apr. 2007, at 11.50, Henri Sivonen wrote:

> The schema (RELAX NG and Schematron) is an implementation detail.  
> It has no normative standing whatsoever (and, in my opinion, should  
> not have). Moreover, the schema *cannot* cover all (X)HTML5  
> conformance requirements.

Can you elaborate on this please?
(Or point me to somewhere where this is described)

What conformance requirements cannot be covered by the schema?



--
Henrik

Received on Friday, 13 April 2007 20:14:39 UTC