Matthew Ratzloff schrieb: > On Fri, April 13, 2007 2:55 pm, Arthur Jennings wrote: >> Perhaps this is a dumb question, but why can't "<!DOCTYPE html>" be that >> clearly identifiable identifier? I doubt it currently occurs in the wild >> outside of authors who are anticipating HTML 5. > > Safari and Firefox don't recognize "<!DOCTYPE html>" as a valid doctype, > instead bailing out to quirks mode. Actually, the WHATWG chose <!DOCTYPE html> because it does trigger standards mode across browsers. --DaoReceived on Friday, 13 April 2007 22:42:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:53 GMT