W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:56:41 +0200
To: "Laurens Holst" <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>, "Geoffrey Sneddon" <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tqmd8rr564w2qv@id-c0020>

On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:49:14 +0200, Laurens Holst  
<lholst@students.cs.uu.nl> wrote:
> That said, I don’t have any particular objections against integrating
> the WHATWG’s specs as a whole. I only fear that with things like for
> example <video> already having proactively been added to the published
> specification draft, implementations even being made already, it will be
> hard for me to effectively argue that <object> should be used.

Do you think that would be different if only parts of HTML5 would be taken  
over? The people currently involved in <video> seem to be mostly on both  
WGs.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 12:56:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:52 GMT