W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

RE: quality of authoring tools' output

From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:45:38 +0200
Message-Id: <p0624061ec24c84ba4374@[]>
To: public-html@w3.org, wri-talk@webrepair.org

At 17:58 -0500 UTC, on 2007-04-18, Dan Connolly wrote:

> On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 00:29 +0200, Sander Tekelenburg wrote:
>> [Since authoring tools are probably considered somewhat OT here,
> on the contrary... our charter specifically calls out
> "Availability of authoring tools and validation tools."
> as well as "Editing APIs and user-driven WYSIWYG editing features."
>  http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html

Quite right. Good :) (The WRI's requirements for authoring tools though go
beyond just valid HTML, even beyond HTML. So there might be a risk of such
discussions getting OT for <public-html@w3.org>.)

Sander Tekelenburg
The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 02:55:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:15:53 GMT