W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:11:16 +1000
To: "Jeff Schiller" <codedread@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tqyt421c64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:07:46 +1000, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>  
wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Jeff Schiller wrote:
>> > And even if you can be reasonably confident - what is the harm in
>> > introducing a "5" into the DOCTYPE somewhere?
>>
>> It encourages people to think of HTML as a versioned specification,
>
> HTML is a versioned specification.

I think he meant versioned language.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 06:12:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:43 UTC