W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z

From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:25:38 -0400
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <20070425182309.M85007@hicom.net>

2 additional/supplemental agenda items:

1. what are canonical HTML's dependencies? 

should we not take into account work such as -- XForms, XPointer, 
RDF, and EARL [note 1] -- and all relevant W3C Technical 
Recommendations published since the last iteration of HTML? 

we should at least come to consensus as a WG by making and 
maintaining a list of such dependencies. 

2. the public-html blog 

what are the proper use and guidelines for adding content to and use 
of the ESW Wiki in the WG's process.  is it a tracking mechanism, a 
catch-all of ideas and brainstorming?  should it be reserved for 
formal proposals and reactions to them?  will there be -- or should 
there be -- a blog monitor, responsible for maintaining proposals 
and overseeing the activities of others who edit the wiki?   

Note 1: 
* XForms: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xforms-20060314/> 
* XPath: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xpath20-20070123/> 
* RDF: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-schema-20040210/> 
* EARL: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-EARL10-Schema-20070323/> 
* OWL: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/> 
* XSLT (a path to backwards compatibility):
* XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0:
* HTTP Vocabulary in RDF: 
CONSERVATIVE, n.  A statesman who is enamored of existing evils,
as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them 
with others.         -- Ambrose Bierce, _The Devil's Dictionary_
             Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net
  Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 18:26:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:19 UTC