Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q

On Apr 2, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote:

> i wholeheartedly agree that we don't want to break compatibility,
> but i don't think that sacrificing logic for compatibility's sake
> is a wise idea either; if something is broken, then fix it, and
> to my mind's eye, Q as presently defined, is broken, and needs to
> be fixed, with the side-benifit that it brings the technical
> recommendation into harmony with itself.

If you favor logical consistency over compatibility, then you  
probably won't be interested in the output of this working group. May  
I suggest contributing to XHTML2 instead?

Regards,
Maciej