public-html@w3.org from August 2007 by date

Friday, 31 August 2007

Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML Philip Taylor
Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) James Graham
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features John Foliot
Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features T.V Raman
Re: Downloading of images by UA Jonas Sicking
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Sam Ruby
Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML (was: Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml) Robert Burns
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Philip Taylor
Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML (was: Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml) Philip Taylor
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Jon Barnett
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Robert Burns
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Jon Barnett
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Roy T. Fielding
Microsoft review of HTML5 draft delayed Chris Wilson
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Robert Burns
Re: Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2) David Håsäther
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Robert Burns
making better ad hoc use of class attribute values Robert Burns
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Sam Ruby
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Sam Ruby
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Roy T. Fielding
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Robert Burns
Re: Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Screen-reader behaviour Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Sander Tekelenburg
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Robert Burns
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Robert Burns
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Mark Baker
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) James Graham
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Sam Ruby
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Mark Baker
Re: Examples for recommending alt omission needed for testing Lachlan Hunt
WF2 2.13. Adding type attribute for the output element (Part of detailed review of WF2) mikko.honkala@nokia.com
Re: Patterns for explicit associations Olivier GENDRIN
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Dean Edridge
Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2) mikko.honkala@nokia.com
Re: Screen-reader behaviour Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Screen-reader behaviour Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Leif Halvard Silli
RE: Screen-reader behaviour DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT
Re: change "scientific documents" to "basic hypertext" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Olivier GENDRIN
Examples for recommending alt omission needed for testing Steve Faulkner
Re: Screen-reader behaviour David Poehlman
Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5 Dean Edridge
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Mark Baker
keeping out semantic facilities for theoretical purity Robert Burns
Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5 Karl Dubost
Re: "presentation concerns" out of scope? (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Marghanita da Cruz
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Sander Tekelenburg
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Screen-reader behaviour Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Screen-reader behaviour Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Screen-reader behaviour Sander Tekelenburg
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Jon Barnett
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Robert Burns
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Leif Halvard Silli

Thursday, 30 August 2007

Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Kornel Lesinski
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Philip TAYLOR
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Leif Halvard Silli
Is there a WIKI of test cases? Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Marghanita da Cruz
product classes, "support some version of XML" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Dan Connolly
let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Dan Connolly
keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Dan Connolly
strike "This specification should be read like all other specifications." (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Dan Connolly
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Arthur Jennings
auction sites and XHTML 2 (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Dan Connolly
"presentation concerns" out of scope? (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Dan Connolly
spell out HTML in title and/or abstract (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Dan Connolly
"vague subject referred to as Web Applications" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Dan Connolly
change "scientific documents" to "basic hypertext" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction) Dan Connolly
RE: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 John Foliot
Re: agenda 30 Aug HTML WG teleconference Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Screen-reader behaviour Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Screen-reader behaviour Al Gilman
Re: Screen-reader behaviour Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Sander Tekelenburg
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Screen-reader behaviour Joshue O Connor
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Leif Halvard Silli
Screen-reader behaviour Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Joshue O Connor
Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content Maurice Carey
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Tighe K. Lory
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Tighe K. Lory
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Tighe K. Lory
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Alastair Campbell
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features David Poehlman
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Jon Barnett
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Tighe K. Lory
The only name for the xml serialisation of html5 Dean Edridge
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Joshue O Connor
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Joshue O Connor
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Steve Faulkner
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Maciej Stachowiak
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Alastair Campbell
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Steve Faulkner
Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title) Marghanita da Cruz
Re: Multilanguage alt/title Robert Burns
Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Multilanguage alt/title Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Boris Zbarsky
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Leif Halvard Silli
Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Multilanguage alt/title Robert Burns
Re: Multilanguage alt/title Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Jon Gunderson
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Jon Barnett
Re: Multilanguage alt/title Robert Burns
Re: Multilanguage alt/title Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Maciej Stachowiak

Wednesday, 29 August 2007

Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Multilanguage alt/title Robert Burns
agenda 30 Aug HTML WG teleconference Chris Wilson
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Gez Lemon
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Jon Barnett
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Michael A Squillace
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 David Poehlman
Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5 Steven Faulkner
teleconference bridge for 30 Aug HTML WG teleconference Dan Connolly
RE: Ruby in HTML Richard Ishida
Re: Multilanguage alt/title Gregory J. Rosmaita
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Andrew Kirkpatrick
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Andrew Kirkpatrick
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Thomas Broyer
Re[2]: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool Dmitry Turin
Re[7]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">) Dmitry Turin
Re[5]: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages> Dmitry Turin
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Jason White
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns

Tuesday, 28 August 2007

Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Marghanita da Cruz
Detailed review of Section 2. The Document Object Model. Lee Kowalkowski
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Robert Burns
Re: Multilanguage alt/title Robert Burns
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Alastair Campbell
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features James Graham
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Joshue O Connor
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Debi Orton
Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content Ben Boyle
Re: Multilanguage alt/title Sander Tekelenburg
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Andrew Kirkpatrick
Re: Removing the data attribute on <object> (detailed review of Semantics) Michael A. Puls II
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Multilanguage alt/title Olivier GENDRIN
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Serialize U+00A0 as   in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) Boris Zbarsky
Re: Serialize U+00A0 as   in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) Alexey Proskuryakov
Re[2]: Decision cube Dmitry Turin
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Lachlan Hunt
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Karl Dubost
Re: [whatwg] Offline Web Apps Elliotte Harold

Monday, 27 August 2007

Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Marghanita da Cruz
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features Joshue O Connor
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Boris Zbarsky
Re: Serialize U+00A0 as   in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) Julian Reschke
Re: Serialize U+00A0 as   in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) Simon Pieters
Re: Serialize U+00A0 as   in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) Julian Reschke
Serialize U+00A0 as   in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) Simon Pieters
Re: Re[3]: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages> Charles McCathieNevile
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Lachlan Hunt
Re: Re[5]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">) Charles McCathieNevile
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Boris Zbarsky
Re: Marking Up Accessible Comic Strips Simon Pieters
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Patrick H. Lauke
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Olivier GENDRIN
Re: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool Charles McCathieNevile
Re: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re[5]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">) Dmitry Turin
Re[6]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">) Dmitry Turin
Re[3]: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages> Dmitry Turin
Re[3]: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool Dmitry Turin
correction of auto-table and auto-tree Репейный Вадим
auto-table & presentation=decart Репейный Вадим
<table><tside>: displaying of table 3x100 of DBMS as table 10x10 Репейный Вадим
Decision cube Репейный Вадим
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Roy T. Fielding
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Marghanita da Cruz
Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content Marghanita da Cruz

Sunday, 26 August 2007

Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: Marking Up Accessible Comic Strips Olivier GENDRIN
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Olivier GENDRIN
Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content Lachlan Hunt
Marking Up Accessible Comic Strips Lachlan Hunt
Re: how to get my login info? Cameron McCormack
how to get my login info? Garrett Smith

Saturday, 25 August 2007

Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Magnus Kristiansen
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Roy T. Fielding
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Magnus Kristiansen
Re: Form Serialization Garrett Smith
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 24 August 2007

Re: This Working Group needs a Secretary Shawn Medero
RE: non-conforming authoring tools: the backplane of portals, networking & photo sites Gloria Reece

Saturday, 25 August 2007

Re: Image Equivalent Content Wiki page Sander Tekelenburg
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Magnus Kristiansen
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Patrick Garies
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Magnus Kristiansen
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Magnus Kristiansen
Re: Image Equivalent Content Wiki page Philip TAYLOR
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke

Friday, 24 August 2007

Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Magnus Kristiansen
Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) Robert Burns
Re: This Working Group needs a Secretary Dan Connolly
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) James Graham
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) James Graham
Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) Robert Burns
Re: This Working Group needs a Secretary Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) Maciej Stachowiak
[HDP] Why Accessibility Is An Important & Essential Principle Gregory J. Rosmaita
RE: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) John Foliot
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Image Equivalent Content Wiki page Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Philip Taylor
RE: [HDP] Other comments from RI Richard Ishida
RE: [HDP] Missing principles Richard Ishida
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
This Working Group needs a Secretary Sam Ruby
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Olivier GENDRIN
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI Olivier GENDRIN
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke
Re: non-conforming authoring tools: the backplane of portals, networking & photo sites Lachlan Hunt
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
Re: Offline Web Apps Robert Burns
Re: Offline Web Apps Marghanita da Cruz
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) Boris Zbarsky
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) Boris Zbarsky
Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Offline Web Apps Maciej Stachowiak
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) Sander Tekelenburg
Offline Web Apps Ian Hickson
Re: An open letter to Anne van Kesteren Karl Dubost
Re: An open letter to Anne van Kesteren Michael A. Puls II
Re: [HDP] Missing principles Karl Dubost
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 23 August 2007

Re: [HDP] Missing principles Marghanita da Cruz
[HDP] principle "Universal Access" Gregory J. Rosmaita
RE: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) John Foliot
Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) Robert Burns
RE: An open letter to Anne van Kesteren John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context Marghanita da Cruz
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
RE: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) Dan Connolly
Re: "real life" longdesc examples Patrick H. Lauke
RE: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) John Foliot
"real life" longdesc examples Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue) Dan Connolly
Re: Answering the question... scott lewis
Answering the question... John Foliot
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context Thomas Higginbotham
non-conforming authoring tools: the backplane of portals, networking & photo sites Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) Boris Zbarsky
Re: conformance (was Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element) Dan Connolly
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) Boris Zbarsky
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context Thomas Higginbotham
[HDP] Other comments from RI Richard Ishida
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) Sander Tekelenburg
An open letter to Anne van Kesteren Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [HDP] Missing principles Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context James Graham
[HDP] Missing principles Richard Ishida
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context Maurice Carey
conformance (was Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element) Ben Boyle
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
<object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Ben Boyle
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context Lachlan Hunt
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [HDP] Secure by design Joshue O Connor
Re: [HDP] Secure by design Robert Burns
Re: Finding Real Use Cases for Longdesc Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] Secure by design Lachlan Hunt
Re: Finding Real Use Cases for Longdesc Andrew Sidwell
Re: [HDP] Secure by design Joshue O Connor
Finding Real Use Cases for Longdesc Lachlan Hunt
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Boris Zbarsky
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Boris Zbarsky
Re: (Un)Ordered lists Dylan Smith
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context Sander Tekelenburg
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Marghanita da Cruz
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Sander Tekelenburg
Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context Lachlan Hunt
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Lachlan Hunt
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Sander Tekelenburg
[HDP] Secure by design Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [HDP] Support World Languages Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Maciej Stachowiak
[HDP] Pave the Cowpaths Robert Burns
Re: Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Ian Hickson
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Robert Burns
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Matthew Raymond
Re: Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Michael A. Puls II

Wednesday, 22 August 2007

Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Marghanita da Cruz
Re: Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Ian Hickson
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Magnus Kristiansen
[HDP] Rename "Pave the Cowpaths" to something less analogy-prone Andrew Sidwell
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Dan Connolly
Re: [HDP] Support World Languages Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] Solving real problems Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Roy T. Fielding
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire James Graham
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Mihai Sucan
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Boris Zbarsky
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Robert Burns
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Mihai Sucan
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element gonchuki
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Dan Connolly
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Joshue O Connor
Review of 3.15.1. The table element Mihai Sucan
Web Forms 2.0 and a Cross-Browser Implementation Weston Ruter
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Lachlan Hunt
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) L. David Baron
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Joshue O Connor
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Julian Reschke
[HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire Lachlan Hunt
Case-insensitive comparison (part of my detailed review of tokenization) Thomas Broyer
Removing the data attribute on <object> (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Dan Connolly
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Dan Connolly
Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Simon Pieters
Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element Philip Taylor
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Chris Blouch
Re: User Testing elements of HTML 5 spec Dan Connolly
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) David Poehlman
Supporting real accessibility Re: Seeing the open issues Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element Mihai Sucan
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Josef Spillner
Re: Difference of content model of |ins| and |del| (part of detailed spec review of Edits) Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Michael A. Puls II
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns

Tuesday, 21 August 2007

RE: Forms Taskforce participation McClure, David M

Wednesday, 22 August 2007

Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Michael A. Puls II
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Sander Tekelenburg
Fwd: Review of Distributed Extensibility in HTML5 Karl Dubost
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Patrick H. Lauke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Maciej Stachowiak
Re: getting feedback from other w3c "accessibility" lists (was: A better ALT) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sam Ruby
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Matthew Raymond
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sander Tekelenburg
Re: link warmth Charles McCathieNevile
Re: getting feedback from other w3c "accessibility" lists (was: A better ALT) Charles McCathieNevile
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Karl Dubost
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Matthew Raymond
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Karl Dubost
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Roy T. Fielding
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Roy T. Fielding
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Marghanita da Cruz
Re: Seeing the open issues Philip Taylor
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Michael A. Puls II

Tuesday, 21 August 2007

Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Michael A. Puls II
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Matthew Raymond
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community ryan
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Maciej Stachowiak
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) L. David Baron
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Roy T. Fielding
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Dan Connolly
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Doug Schepers
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) Maciej Stachowiak
RE: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Chris Wilson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Maciej Stachowiak
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sander Tekelenburg
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: Seeing the open issues Steve Faulkner
Re: no mention of BOMs in sniffing algorithm ryan
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Chris Blouch
Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element Philip Taylor
Re: (Un)Ordered lists Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: (Un)Ordered lists Simon Pieters
Re: Seeing the open issues Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Roy T. Fielding
Re: Seeing the open issues Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (new thread?) Dan Connolly
Re: Rewriting |m| Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: (Un)Ordered lists Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (new thread?) Sam Ruby
Rewriting |m| Geoffrey Sneddon
Visible greater-than sign (part of detailed review of edits) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) liorean
Difference of content model of |ins| and |del| (part of detailed spec review of Edits) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Lachlan Hunt
Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element Mihai Sucan
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
RE: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Chris Wilson
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Leif Halvard Silli
(Un)Ordered lists Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) João Eiras
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sander Tekelenburg
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Joshue O Connor
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) liorean
RE: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Richard Conyard
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Chris Blouch
Re: no mention of BOMs in sniffing algorithm Dan Connolly
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Sander Tekelenburg
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (new thread?) Dan Connolly
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Ben Boyle
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Dan Connolly
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples Ben Boyle
Re: document.title (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Leif Halvard Silli
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Seeing the open issues Steve Faulkner
Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
IE's object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Sander Tekelenburg
HTML5 - Video and audio codecs for video elements Marghanita da Cruz
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke
Re: Seeing the open issues Ian Hickson
Re: Seeing the open issues Steve Faulkner
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Karl Dubost
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Robert Burns
Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Robert Burns
Re: [Offtopic] Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Robert Burns
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Ian Hickson
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Forms Taskforce participation Matthew Raymond
Hierarchical link types Philip Taylor
no mention of BOMs in sniffing algorithm ryan

Monday, 20 August 2007

Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Cameron McCormack
is OBJECT broken? if so by whom & what can be done? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Permitted slash not defined in terms of void elements (part of my detailed review of the tokenization section) Thomas Broyer
RE: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Richard Conyard
Re: Seeing the open issues Ian Hickson
Seeing the open issues Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sam Ruby
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sam Ruby
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples Julian Reschke
Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sam Ruby
Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples Lachlan Hunt
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Maciej Stachowiak
content type configuration prototype, usability testing? [was: review ... by IETF/HTTP community] Dan Connolly
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sam Ruby
RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Chris Wilson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Philip Taylor
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Lachlan Hunt
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community James Graham
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Maurice Carey
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Patrick H. Lauke
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Philip Taylor
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sam Ruby
[Offtopic] Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Thomas Broyer
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Maurice Carey
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Dan Connolly
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Lachlan Hunt
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Maurice Carey
Placeholder Text for Text Boxes Lachlan Hunt
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Julian Reschke
process proposals should start off-list [was: ... categorize messages and threads] Dan Connolly
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Dan Connolly
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Julian Reschke
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Cameron McCormack
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Anne van Kesteren
Review of table processing model (section 3.15.11. Processing model) James Graham
Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Anne van Kesteren
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Robert Burns
Re: M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email) Rob Burns
Re: abbreviation exposition and pronunciation Robert Burns
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Olivier GENDRIN
Re: M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email) Lachlan Hunt
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Jon Gunderson

Sunday, 19 August 2007

Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Karl Dubost
Re: abbreviation exposition and pronunciation Karl Dubost
Re: M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email) Rob Burns
Design Principles Premise Laura Carlson
numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Robert Burns
Re: abbreviation exposition and pronunciation Matthew Raymond
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Robert Burns
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Jason White

Saturday, 18 August 2007

Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Philip Taylor
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Joshue O Connor
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns
Re: Stripping leading line feeds Philip Taylor
Stripping leading line feeds Philip Taylor
Re: A better longdesc Joshue O Connor
Re: A better ALT Peter Krantz
A better ALT Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Joshue O Connor
getting feedback from other w3c "accessibility" lists (was: A better ALT) Gregory J. Rosmaita
A better ALT Sander Tekelenburg
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Robert Burns
[HDP] 3.3. Media Independence Robert Burns
editorial comment about "4.7.4. Content-Type sniffing: feed or HTML" ryan
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Jason White
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Lachlan Hunt
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Robert Burns

Friday, 17 August 2007

Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Sam Ruby
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Ian Hickson
review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community Dan Connolly
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Joshue O Connor

Thursday, 16 August 2007

Re: Form Serialization Ian J. Wessman
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Ian J. Wessman

Friday, 17 August 2007

Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Ian J. Wessman
Editorial issues (part of detailed review of "Determining the type of a new resource in a browsing context") Geoffrey Sneddon
Step 10 of Feed/HTML sniffing (part of detailed review of "Determining the type of a new resource in a browsing context") Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Dan Connolly
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Dan Connolly
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) Philip Taylor
please review "XHTML Role Attribute Module" working draft Dan Connolly
<figure> and <img> (was Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG) Jon Barnett
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Maurice Carey
Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data Ben Boyle
review of HTML Design Principles - questionnaire Steven Faulkner
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Joshue O Connor
Re: [Spam] Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Joshue O Connor
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Steven Faulkner
[HDP] 3.3. Media Independence Marcin Hanclik
Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data Karl Dubost
Re: HTML Design Principles Review Joshue O Connor
Re: Ian's Approach to Editing (Was: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state) Robert Burns
Re: Ian's Approach to Editing (Was: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state) Smylers
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Robert Burns
Re: Form Serialization Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Smylers
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data Robert Burns
Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data Karl Dubost
Re: Form Serialization Edward O'Connor
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Robert Burns
Re: QA vs. Baby Steps, Cowpaths, RealProblems Leif Halvard Silli
QA vs. Baby Steps, Cowpaths, RealProblems Leif Halvard Silli
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] error in "Support World Languages" Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [HDP] error in "Support World Languages" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Form Serialization Jon Barnett

Thursday, 16 August 2007

[HDP] error in "Support World Languages" Leif Halvard Silli
[ FIELDSET ] - disabled and readonly Garrett Smith
Form Serialization Garrett Smith
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Jon Barnett
Re: HTML Design Principles Review Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML Design Principles Review Dan Connolly
Re: Support for Design Principles Lachlan Hunt
Re: Support for Design Principles (was: Design Principles survey delayed) Dan Connolly
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Maciej Stachowiak
Fwd: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Jon Barnett
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? James Graham
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? James Graham
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: link warmth Geoffrey Sneddon
RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Evans, Donald
Re: link warmth Philip Taylor (Webmaster)

Wednesday, 15 August 2007

link warmth Michael Horn

Thursday, 16 August 2007

Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Jan Richards
Re: 4.5. Interfaces for URI manipulation Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Design Principles survey delayed Maciej Stachowiak
HTML Design Principles Review Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Robert Burns
Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? William Loughborough
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Philip Taylor
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Robert Burns
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Robert Burns
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Philip Taylor
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
4.5. Interfaces for URI manipulation Ben Boyle
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) James Graham
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Robert Burns
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Robert Burns
Re: Support for Design Principles (was: Design Principles survey delayed) Steven Faulkner
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) James Graham
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Robert Burns
Re: Evidence of usefulness of specific accessibility solutions (was Rewording the Design Principles) Joshue O Connor
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? scott lewis
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) Joshue O Connor
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? scott lewis
Re: Maxmizing Useful alt Text (Was: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Smylers
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Ian Hickson
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? aurélien levy
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Robert Burns
Re: Omitting alt Where It's Unknown (Was: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?) Smylers
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Jason White
Re: Support for Design Principles (was: Design Principles survey delayed) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Robert Burns
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state Jason White
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Lachlan Hunt
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Jason White
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? James Graham
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Robert Burns
using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?] Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Lachlan Hunt
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Karl Dubost
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Lachlan Hunt
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Jason White
edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG Robert Burns
Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Lachlan Hunt
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Robert Burns
Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Karl Dubost
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns

Wednesday, 15 August 2007

Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Research needs tracking Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? James Graham
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: unconference agenda for HTML WG meeting 8-9 Nov? Dan Connolly
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Michael A. Puls II
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
practical use/techniques of alt attribute for images Karl Dubost
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: agenda HTML WG 16 Aug: design principles, spec reviews, table headers, XML serialization name, forms TF, ... Ian Hickson
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? James Graham
agenda HTML WG 16 Aug: design principles, spec reviews, table headers, XML serialization name, forms TF, ... Dan Connolly
Baby Steps or Backwards Steps? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Lachlan Hunt
Re: Distributed Extensibility Dan Connolly
Forms Taskforce participation Dan Connolly
Design Principles survey delayed Dan Connolly
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Michael A. Puls II
Re: Research needs tracking Dan Connolly
agenda HTML WG teleconference 16 Aug (in progress) Dan Connolly
RE: Ruby in HTML Chris Wilson
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip TAYLOR
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Ben Boyle
Re: Serializing PIs in HTML (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) Michael A. Puls II
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Editorial: "child node" (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) Simon Pieters
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor
<object>: should the name attribute be allowed for form submission with plug-ins? Michael A. Puls II
Serializing PIs in HTML (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments) Simon Pieters
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Robert Burns
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Ben Boyle
Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">) Ian Hickson
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: editing the wiki Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) Jason White
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Lachlan Hunt
Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data Robert Burns
Re: editing the wiki Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 14 August 2007

Evidence of usefulness of specific accessibility solutions (was Rewording the Design Principles) Sander Tekelenburg

Wednesday, 15 August 2007

editing the wiki Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) Karl Dubost
Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) Ian Hickson
Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) Jason White
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Jason White
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps) Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 14 August 2007

Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor (Webmaster)

Wednesday, 15 August 2007

Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Jason White
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Ruby in HTML Karl Dubost
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Dan Connolly
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki Gregory J. Rosmaita

Tuesday, 14 August 2007

Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Ian Hickson
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki (was Re: problem-statements for HTML 4.01 differences) Robert Burns
Re: Improving the Header Relationship Algorithm (Discussion) Robert Burns
Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) T.V Raman
Keeping some order in the wiki (was Re: problem-statements for HTML 4.01 differences) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) James Graham
Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Lachlan Hunt
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (was: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel) Lachlan Hunt
Starting On Topic (Rant) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft Lachlan Hunt
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel Lachlan Hunt
Re: highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft Steven Faulkner
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel James Graham
Re: highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft Lachlan Hunt
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel Tom Morris
Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Robert Burns
Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Robert Burns
highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft Steven Faulkner
Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax Robert Burns
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Robert Burns
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Robert Burns
Re: Research needs tracking Robert Burns
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Jason White
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel] Joshue O Connor
Research needs tracking Robert Burns
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Ian Hickson
problem-statements for HTML 4.01 differences Rob Burns
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Ian Hickson
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Jason White
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Robert Burns
WYSIWYG, GUI, visual and non-semantic editors: final part of my review of 9 WYSIWYG editors Robert Burns
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel Lachlan Hunt
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research Ian Hickson
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Robert Burns

Monday, 13 August 2007

WYSIWYG, GUI, visual and non-semantic editors: part of my review of 9 WYSIWYG editors Robert Burns
Re: HTML5 Draft Request: use an ISO 639-2 specified language Karl Dubost
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel Doug Schepers
Re: HTML5 Draft Request: use an ISO 639-2 specified language Philip TAYLOR
Re: HTML5 Draft Request: use an ISO 639-2 specified language Karl Dubost
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Gregory J. Rosmaita
HTML5 Draft Request: use an ISO 639-2 specified language Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Doug Schepers
Re: Improving the Header Relationship Algorithm (Discussion) Robert Burns
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel Joshue O Connor
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel Joshue O Connor
a web site that is incompatible with HTML5 namespace requirements for HTML serialization Maciej Stachowiak
Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel Lachlan Hunt
Re: Distributed Extensibility Dan Connolly
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Improving the Header Relationship Algorithm (Discussion) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Distributed Extensibility Dan Connolly
Re: 3.8.10. The address element j.j.
Stephen Ferg's Table Research Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Steven Faulkner
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Ben Boyle
Multipage version of spec Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Rimantas Liubertas
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: non-leading <param>s in <object> fallback (detailed review of Semantics) Michael A. Puls II
Re: Text presentation of image maps (detailed review of Semantics) Ian Hickson
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Ian Hickson
Re: non-leading <param>s in <object> fallback (detailed review of Semantics) Ian Hickson
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Josef Spillner
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration Robert Burns
[admin] W3C Wiki migration Karl Dubost

Friday, 10 August 2007

Thursday, 9 August 2007

Re: SMIL 3 WD and HTML 5 Editor's draft Dave Singer
Re: table, column group, column, row groups, TABLE, CAPTION, COLGROUP, COL, THEAD, TFOOT, TR, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data Lachlan Hunt
table, cell, heading, row, header, TD, TH,TR: part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data Robert Burns
table, column group, column, row groups, TABLE, CAPTION, COLGROUP, COL, THEAD, TFOOT, TR, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data Robert Burns
SMIL 3 WD and HTML 5 Editor's draft Karl Dubost
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Robert Burns
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Sander Tekelenburg

Wednesday, 8 August 2007

Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Robert Burns
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 3.8. Sections Sander Tekelenburg
Re: complex tables: heading cells and summary cells Robert Burns
Re: 3.8. Sections Robert Burns
Re: complex tables: heading cells and summary cells Lachlan Hunt
Re: 3.8. Sections Lachlan Hunt
Multipage version of spec (was Re: 3.8.10. The address element) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 3.8. Sections Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Maurice Carey
Re: 3.8. Sections Ben Boyle
Re: 3.8. Sections Anne van Kesteren
Text presentation of image maps with <object> (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: 3.8. Sections Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 3.8. Sections Anne van Kesteren
Re: 3.8. Sections Sander Tekelenburg
Text presentation of image maps (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Smylers
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Smylers
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Henri Sivonen
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Jason White
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Robert Burns
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Anne van Kesteren
Re: 3.8. Sections Ben Boyle
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Ben Boyle
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Ben Boyle
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Steven Faulkner
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Jason White
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Robert Burns
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: complex tables: heading cells and summary cells Robert Burns
Re: complex tables: heading cells and summary cells Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Robert Burns

Tuesday, 7 August 2007

Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: 3.8. Sections Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Determining Script Type Sierk Bornemann
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Philip TAYLOR
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Sander Tekelenburg
complex tables: heading cells and summary cells Robert Burns
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Sander Tekelenburg
Determining Script Type Jim Jewett
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Robert Burns
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Robert Burns
Re: 3.8. Sections Robert Burns
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
Re: Rewording Algorithms and Script Types Smylers
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Smylers
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Simon Pieters
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Anne van Kesteren
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Edward O'Connor
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Philip TAYLOR
rewording algorithms Jim Jewett
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Ben Boyle
Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Lee Kowalkowski
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Ben Boyle
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Simon Pieters
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Anne van Kesteren
Re: meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Anne van Kesteren
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Ben Boyle
meta refresh (3.7.5.3. Pragma directives) Ben Boyle
Re: 3.8.10. The address element Anne van Kesteren
3.8. Sections Ben Boyle
3.8.10. The address element Ben Boyle
non-leading <param>s in <object> fallback (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Distributed Extensibility Karl Dubost
RE: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Richard Ishida
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
Re: Data Table Collections (Research) Ian Hickson
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Robert Burns

Monday, 6 August 2007

Re: Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) Martin Espericueta

Tuesday, 7 August 2007

Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Robert Burns
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Karl Dubost
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Table Collection - W3C HTML Working Group Top 200 Survey Sean Fraser

Monday, 6 August 2007

Re: Table Collection - W3C HTML Working Group Top 200 Survey Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Craig Francis
Re: Data Table Collections (Research) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) Robert Burns
Re: Likert scale for survey? (on design principles) Dan Connolly
Re: Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
Re: <p><table> parsing (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Jon Barnett
Re: Likert scale for survey? (on design principles) Laura Carlson
Re: Likert scale for survey? (on design principles) Laura Carlson
Re: Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) Robert Burns
Re: Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) liorean
Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility Robert Burns
Semantics (was : Formal Recorded Complaint) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
Re: Likert scale for survey? (on design principles) Dan Connolly
Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility Henri Sivonen
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: Assertions regarding the quality of HTML documents Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 3.14.11. The canvas element Ben Boyle
Assertions regarding the quality of HTML documents Jason White
Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility Henri Sivonen
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Mihai Sucan
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Jason White
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Karl Dubost
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Data Table Collections (Research) Karl Dubost
Data Table Collections (Research) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Jason White
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Jason White
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Robert Burns
Re: integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Jason White
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Debi Orton

Sunday, 5 August 2007

Detailed review of 3.14.9. Media elements Mihai Sucan
Re: Distributed Extensibility Philip Taylor
Re: 3.14.11. The canvas element Philip Taylor
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Jason White
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
3.8.8. The header element Ben Boyle
3.14.11. The canvas element Ben Boyle
Re: Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element Robert Burns
Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element Ben Boyle
Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element Jason White
Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element Robert Burns
Re: integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? Ian Hickson
Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element Lachlan Hunt
Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element Cameron McCormack
Re: arguments for retention of LEGEND and FIELDSET Maciej Stachowiak
arguments for retention of LEGEND and FIELDSET Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? Jason White
Re: The <label> Lachlan Hunt
Re: integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element Sander Tekelenburg
Re: integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? Lachlan Hunt
Re: The canvas element (detailed review) Cameron McCormack
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Distributed Extensibility Robert Burns
Re: The <label> Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: transparent content model and proposed ALT element Robert Burns

Saturday, 4 August 2007

Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Sander Tekelenburg
integration of WF2 into HTML5 draft -- when, if, and how? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Philip Taylor
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Robert Burns
Re: Distributed Extensibility Julian Reschke
Re: The canvas element (detailed review) Andrew Fedoniouk
Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element Mihai Sucan
The <label> Craig Francis
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Mihai Sucan
Re: Distributed Extensibility Philip Taylor
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: DIV as an inline container Robert Burns
Re: Distributed Extensibility Simon Pieters
Re: DIV as an inline container liorean
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Lachlan Hunt
Re: Distributed Extensibility Robert Burns
Re: Distributed Extensibility Robert Burns
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of Simon Pieters
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Robert Burns
Re: DIV as an inline container Robert Burns
Re: The canvas element (detailed review) Philip Taylor
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of Robert Burns
Likert scale for survey? Laura Carlson
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
Re: Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
Re: DIV as an inline container liorean
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Mihai Sucan
W3C terminology (was Re: Rephrasing Universal Access Design Principle) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: transparent content model and proposed ALT element Jason White
Re: transparent content model Robert Burns
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content Sander Tekelenburg
Re: transparent content model Jason White
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Robert Burns
transparent content model Robert Burns
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Jason White
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Robert Burns
Re: The canvas element (detailed review) Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Bill Mason
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content Lachlan Hunt
HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Robert Burns
Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review Ian Hickson
Re: Rephrasing Universal Access Design Principle (was Re: Formal Recorded Complaint) Jason White
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of Jason White
The canvas element (detailed review) Philip Taylor
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Jon Barnett
DIV as an inline container Robert Burns
Re: Marking up alternative versions of content Jason White
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Robert Burns
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Sander Tekelenburg

Friday, 3 August 2007

Rephrasing Universal Access Design Principle (was Re: Formal Recorded Complaint) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Ian Hickson
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Jirka Kosek
Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Ian Hickson
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of Mihai Sucan
Re: Distributed Extensibility Philip Taylor
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of Sander Tekelenburg
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Dan Connolly
Re: Distributed Extensibility Dan Connolly
care with subject lines, please [was: Formal Recorded Complaint] Dan Connolly
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Issues surrounding Tables: backwards compatibility and complex tables Robert Burns
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of Anne van Kesteren
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of Robert Burns
Re: Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
Re: Distributed Extensibility Philip Taylor
Correction for 3.2.4.2. Vaguer moments in time Mihai Sucan
Re: CR and LF in the input stream / as NCRs (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Michael A. Puls II
Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Jason White
Review: 3.4.6. The irrelevant attribute Mihai Sucan
9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) Mihai Sucan
completion of review of "Prose" section (currently 3.9) Robert Burns
Re: Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility (was Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content) Henri Sivonen
The br element: part of review of "Prose" section (currently 3.9) Robert Burns
The p element: part of review of "Prose" section (currently 3.9) Robert Burns
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Joshue O Connor
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Jason White
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Karl Dubost
Re: Maturity of XML Karl Dubost
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content Jason White

Thursday, 2 August 2007

Re: Minutes, HTML WG 2007-08-02 phone conference Lee Kowalkowski
Re: Distributed Extensibility Thomas Broyer
Real solutions, semantics, and proposals of members of this WG Robert Burns
Re: Minutes, HTML WG 2007-08-02 phone conference Dan Connolly
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
Re: CR and LF in the input stream / as NCRs (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Michael A. Puls II
Re: Comments on IRC log Ian Hickson
Re: Distributed Extensibility Philip Taylor
Minutes, HTML WG 2007-08-02 phone conference Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Distributed Extensibility Philip Taylor
Re: Steps Towards a Common WG Vocabulary Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Maturity of XML Philip TAYLOR
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Jim Jewett
Re: Distributed Extensibility Julian Reschke
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content Sander Tekelenburg
Distinguishing different aspects of accessibility (was Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Entities (part of detailed review) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Distributed Extensibility Thomas Broyer
Re: Maturity of XML Lachlan Hunt
Re: Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
Re: Entities (part of detailed review) Thomas Broyer
Re: Entities (part of detailed review) Thomas Broyer
RE: @lang => @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Richard Ishida
Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review Laura Carlson
RE: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Richard Ishida
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Matthew Raymond
3.8.5. The blockquote element Ben Boyle
Ruby in HTML Anne van Kesteren
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint James Graham
Re: @lang => @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Jason White
3.8.1. The body element Ben Boyle
Re: Entities (part of detailed review) Thomas Broyer
Re: Maturity of XML Philip TAYLOR
Re: Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: Comments on IRC log Joshue O Connor
Re: Conformance checkers Henri Sivonen
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) Henri Sivonen
Re: XML versions Jirka Kosek
Re: XML versions Karl Dubost
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Robert Burns
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Henri Sivonen
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Ian Hickson
Re: Comments on IRC log Ian Hickson
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Robert Burns
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Robert Burns
Re: Maturity of XML Karl Dubost
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Henri Sivonen
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Henri Sivonen
Indexing agreement on accessibility Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Conformance checkers Karl Dubost
@lang => @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Sander Tekelenburg
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Sander Tekelenburg
traffic shaping on the list Jason White
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Maturity Re: (of XML) Ben Boyle
Re: Opening thoughts on WAI-ARIA in HTML5 Matthew Raymond
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Ben Boyle
Steps Towards a Common WG Vocabulary Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content Jason White
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Ian Hickson
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Jason White

Wednesday, 1 August 2007

Re: Formal Recorded Complaint T.V Raman
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) T.V Raman
Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review Ian Hickson
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Jim Jewett
detailed spec reviews wiki page Robert Burns
Re: 3.4. Global attributes Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Alternate Additional Attribute Set for a Single Quote Element Robert Burns
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Robert Burns
Re: Alternate Additional Attribute Set for a Single Quote Element Robert Burns
Namespaces in HTML (Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element) Thomas Broyer
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content Sander Tekelenburg
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Thomas Broyer
Re: Maturity Re: (of XML) Julian Reschke
agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2 Aug Dan Connolly
scribe for tomorrow's teleconference, please? Dan Connolly
Maturity Re: (of XML) Charles McCathieNevile
UAAG Test Suite: User Agent Support for HTML 4.01 Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Maturity of XML Philip Taylor
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Robert Burns
Re: Reality Check: Bi-polar Accessibility Disorder (BAD) Dave Singer
Alternate Additional Attribute Set for a Single Quote Element Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Thomas Broyer
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Robert Burns
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Robert Burns
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Henri Sivonen
Re: Maturity of XML Julian Reschke
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Anne van Kesteren
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Robert Burns
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Robert Burns
Re: 3.6. The root element Robert Burns
Re: Maturity of XML Philip TAYLOR
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Jim Jewett
Re: 3.6. The root element Anne van Kesteren
Re: Maturity of XML Julian Reschke
Re: 3.6. The root element Robert Burns
Re: XML versions Henri Sivonen
Re: Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Peter Karlsson
Re: XML versions Henri Sivonen
Re: XML versions Jirka Kosek
Re: Entities (part of detailed review) Henri Sivonen
Re: Entities (part of detailed review) Anne van Kesteren
Re: XML versions Jirka Kosek
Re: Entities (part of detailed review) Jirka Kosek
Conformance checkers Jirka Kosek
Re: Entities (part of detailed review) Thomas Broyer
Re: Maturity of XML Henri Sivonen
Re: XML versions Henri Sivonen
Maturity of XML Jirka Kosek
Re: XHTML2 and namespaces (part of detailed review) Henri Sivonen
XML versions Jirka Kosek
XHTML2 and namespaces (part of detailed review) Jirka Kosek
Namespaces (part of detailed review) Jirka Kosek
Accessibility and design principles in action Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Charles McCathieNevile
Re: 3.6. The root element Ben Boyle
Entities (part of detailed review) Jirka Kosek
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element James Graham
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Doug Schepers
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Jason White
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Henri Sivonen
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Thomas Broyer
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Anne van Kesteren
Re: 3.6. The root element Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML 5 proposal - OBJECT elements, environment discovery and alternative content Thomas Broyer
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: Reality Check: Bi-polar Accessibility Disorder (BAD) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Henri Sivonen
Re: authoring @lang and @dir (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
Re: 3.6. The root element Robert Burns
Re: Patterns for explicit associations Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Patterns for explicit associations Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Ian Hickson
Re: Reflecting attributes: HTMLElement (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson
Re: <li value=bogus> (detailed review of Semantics) Ian Hickson
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Ian Hickson
Re: 3.6. The root element Michael A. Puls II
Re: 3.6. The root element Jason White
Re: 3.6. The root element Robert Burns
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Jason White
Re: 3.5.2. Focus moz@jeka.info
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Jason White
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Robert Burns
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Jason White
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Karl Dubost

Last message date: Friday, 31 August 2007 23:46:20 UTC