Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of

On Aug 3, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>
> On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:28:09 +0200, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>  
> wrote:
>> If anyone can state the use-case / problem statement on this editor
>> signature, that would be very helpful.
>
> As stated in the draft, it's to allow validators to not mark <font>  
> elements as being non-conforming. I don't believe many people are  
> convinced this section of the draft is a particularly good solution  
> to the "WYSIWYG problem" though. There have been some suggestions  
> on the WHATWG list by Henri Sivonen iirc on how to improve this.

Is this the message of Henri's you're referring to?

<http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-January/ 
009067.html>

Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 12:23:46 UTC