- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:09:10 -0500
- To: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: "Gregory J.Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>, Olivier Théreaux <ot@w3.org>
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 21:22 -0500, Robert Burns wrote: [...] > Perhaps, W3C could establish a new sub-domain for the new WIKI and > leave the old WIKI in place. Or move the old wiki intact to a > different subdomain and provide links between the two. We have been sharing a wiki with some semantic web interest groups, the QA interest group, participants of an XML Schema workshop, etc. That was convenient for me, for a time, since it was a wiki I already used somewhat regularly. But I think it would be better for us to have a dedicated wiki, so that, for example, the "recent changes" only contains HTML WG business. I'm inclined to start a new HTML WG wiki and migrate content from the ESW wiki manually. For example, the SpecReviews topic... http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SpecReviews I'd likely - copy it to the new wiki - put a link at the bottom of the new wiki topic that says "for history before August 2007, see ESW:SpecReviews" - replace the contents of the ESW wiki topic with a "this has migrated to SpecReviews in the HTML WG wiki" pointer; the history remains intact. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2007 01:09:25 UTC