- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:21:01 +0200
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- CC: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > ... > Later Julian Reschke replied: >> I think they do. >> XHTML: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3236#section-2> >> Template: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4288#section-4.11> > > One of Karl points was probably that one actually recommend several extensions for (in this case) XHTML. By recommending only .XHTML, XHTML-files would in most cases automatically be served as 'application/xhtml+xml', and thus authors/users would experience the effects of XHTML. RFC3236 mentions XHTML, XHT and HTML. Apache 2.2.x comes with a preconfigured mapping file (mime.types) which has application/xhtml+xml xhtml xht so as far as I can tell, it already does what you're looking for (and probably has for a long time). Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 12:21:23 UTC