- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:05:05 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Ben Boyle wrote: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#address > > 1. I think there is some poor wording here: "Typically, the address > element would be included with other information in a footer element." > The footer element explicitly states it cannot include sections, i.e. > footer cannot contain address. <address> isn't a sectioning element, unless I've made a mistake somewhere. > 2. Would anyone else like the content model of address broadened? I > would like to be able to structure contact details using lists and > tables (when appropriate) and to do this within address tags. The > "paragraph" model is restrictive and I don't understand the reasons for > the restriction. I suppose we could change this for XHTML, but for HTML we're constrained by legacy parsing behaviour (which is somewhat... special... for <address>). > 3. grammar... in the note "a aside" should be "an aside" Thanks, will fix. > 4. could the examples use lowercase tagnames to comply with xhtml (and > html) serialisaton? I'm trying to make the examples have a wide variety of styles to not mislead people who skim examples into thinking only one style is allowed. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 13 August 2007 07:05:13 UTC