- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:42:41 +0900
- To: Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Dean Edridge (30 août 2007 - 20:37) :
> To my understanding XHTML 2 is not an XML serialisation of HTML,
> but a whole new language based on XML, not HTML4 or XHTML1.x.
Just a clarification point if necessary (and not taking side on this
debate).
The "X" in XHTML 1.0 doesn't mean "XML serialization", but extensible.
XHTML™ 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/
Maybe it should have been called "ehtml". :)
PS:
For now, when I talk about serializations of html5, I use
html5/html
html5/xml
and try to use html5 only for the abstract model, not the syntax.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 02:43:30 UTC