- From: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:12:15 -0500
- To: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Cc: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Aug 16, 2007, at 8:58 AM, James Graham wrote: > Robert Burns wrote: >> >> Which results are you referring to here. Ian looked for misused >> <input usemap> elements. Philip looked for <blink> and <element-I >> just-mad-up> on another data set. The couldn't reproduce the same >> results because they were looking for different things. > > I meant, more generally, that the two different surveys they did > have produced similar results for questions like "what fraction of > pages use the <foo> element?" rather than questions specifically > related to <input usemap>. IIRC Phillip didn't find any use of > <input usemap> (which you would predict from the the small usage > found by Hixie and the relative number of pages in the two surveys). Niether Hixe nor Philip looked for use of <input usemap> . Hixie looked for misuse (or esoteric use) of <input usemap>. Philip looked for other stuff (and unsurprisingly didn't find any <input usemap>). Take care, Rob
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2007 14:12:24 UTC