- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:23:23 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
Sander Tekelenburg wrote: > At 15:49 +0300 UTC, on 2007-08-31, <mikko.honkala@nokia.com> wrote: > > [...] > >> 2.8. The form attribute > [...] >> * Change references from companies (google/yahoo) to example.com: >> "submits the text control to google.cgi, the third button submits the >> same text control to yahoo.cgi." The same applies to the example in this >> section. > > Actually, I'd rather see the spec use the .example top level domain for > examples. It is reserved for exactly this purpose. (See RFC 2606.) Aren't these both a bit picky ? If the real point at issue is the use of tradenames, why not use invented names such as "mysearch.cgi", "yoursearch.cgi", etc. Since the original doesn't have any domain, why seek to introduce one ? Philip TAYLOR
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 16:23:42 UTC